Ford Puma Gen-E vs Toyota Urban Cruiser

Biggest differences: Charging 10–80% — Ford Puma Gen-E 26 min, Toyota Urban Cruiser 45 min · Boot — Ford Puma Gen-E 523 l, Toyota Urban Cruiser 310 l · DC charging — Ford Puma Gen-E 100 kW, Toyota Urban Cruiser 67 kW.

Ford Puma Gen-E

The Ford Puma Gen-E is an all-electric subcompact crossover with a range of 419 kilometers and acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in 8 seconds.

Toyota Urban Cruiser

The Toyota Urban Cruiser is an electric SUV in the B segment, offering three different motor configurations and battery capacities.

Profile against the market: Ford Puma Gen-E vs Toyota Urban Cruiser

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Ford Puma Gen-E or Toyota Urban Cruiser — who wins where

Ford Puma Gen-E leads 7 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmToyota Urban Cruiser +7 km
    Ford Puma Gen-E
    419
    Toyota Urban Cruiser
    426
  • Battery kWhToyota Urban Cruiser +14.2 kWh
    Ford Puma Gen-E
    46.8
    Toyota Urban Cruiser
    61
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmFord Puma Gen-E −2.1 kWh/100 km
    Ford Puma Gen-E
    13
    Toyota Urban Cruiser
    15.1
  • Power PSToyota Urban Cruiser +6 PS
    Ford Puma Gen-E
    168
    Toyota Urban Cruiser
    174
  • 0–100 km/h sFord Puma Gen-E −0.7 s
    Ford Puma Gen-E
    8
    Toyota Urban Cruiser
    8.7
  • Top speed km/hFord Puma Gen-E +10 km/h
    Ford Puma Gen-E
    160
    Toyota Urban Cruiser
    150
  • DC charging kWFord Puma Gen-E +33 kW
    Ford Puma Gen-E
    100
    Toyota Urban Cruiser
    67
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Ford Puma Gen-E
    11
    Toyota Urban Cruiser
    11
  • Charging minFord Puma Gen-E −19 min
    Ford Puma Gen-E
    26
    Toyota Urban Cruiser
    45
  • Weight kgFord Puma Gen-E −351 kg
    Ford Puma Gen-E
    1488
    Toyota Urban Cruiser
    1839
  • Boot lFord Puma Gen-E +213 l
    Ford Puma Gen-E
    523
    Toyota Urban Cruiser
    310

Add a third car

Technical data: Ford Puma Gen-E vs Toyota Urban Cruiser

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Ford Puma Gen-E vs Toyota Urban Cruiser
Key parameters Ford Puma Gen-E
Electric
Toyota Urban Cruiser
61 FWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range419 km426 kmToyota +7 km
Battery46.8 kWh61 kWhToyota +14.2 kWh
Consumption13 kWh/100 km15.1 kWh/100 kmFord −2.1 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW67 kWFord +33 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%26 min45 minFord −19 min
Range per minute of charging11.3 km/min6.6 km/minFord +4.7 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power168 PS174 PSToyota +6 PS
0–100 km/h8 s8.7 sFord −0.7 s
Top speed160 km/h150 km/hFord +10 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1488 kg1839 kgFord −351 kg
Boot523 l310 lFord +213 l
Length4214 mm4285 mmToyota +71 mm
Width1805 mm1800 mmFord +5 mm
Height1555 mm1635 mmToyota +80 mm
Wheelbase2588 mm2700 mmToyota +112 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Ford Puma Gen-E

Cost per 100 km3.9
Monthly49
Yearly585

Toyota Urban Cruiser

Cost per 100 km4.53
Monthly57
Yearly679

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Ford Puma Gen-E

Toyota Urban Cruiser

Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the bigger boot?

The Ford Puma Gen-E takes more: 523 l against 310 l in the Toyota Urban Cruiser. The difference is 213 l.

Which charges faster?

The Ford Puma Gen-E accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Toyota Urban Cruiser up to 67 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 26 and 45 min respectively.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Ford Puma Gen-E uses less electricity: 13 kWh/100 km against 15.1 kWh/100 km in the Toyota Urban Cruiser. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 315 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.