Toyota Urban Cruiser vs Volvo EX30
Biggest differences: DC charging — Toyota Urban Cruiser 67 kW, Volvo EX30 175 kW · Charging 10–80% — Toyota Urban Cruiser 45 min, Volvo EX30 27 min · 0–100 km/h — Toyota Urban Cruiser 8.7 s, Volvo EX30 5.3 s.
Toyota Urban Cruiser
The Toyota Urban Cruiser is an electric SUV in the B segment, offering three different motor configurations and battery capacities.
Volvo EX30
The Volvo EX30 is an all-electric SUV in the B segment, offering a wide range of powertrain configurations with varying ranges and performance levels.
Profile against the market: Toyota Urban Cruiser vs Volvo EX30
Toyota Urban Cruiser61 FWD
Volvo EX30P5 Long Range
Toyota Urban Cruiser or Volvo EX30 — who wins where
Volvo EX30 leads 9 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmVolvo EX30 +49 km
- Battery kWhVolvo EX30 +8 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmToyota Urban Cruiser −1.9 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolvo EX30 +98 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolvo EX30 −3.4 s
- Top speed km/hVolvo EX30 +30 km/h
- DC charging kWVolvo EX30 +108 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minVolvo EX30 −18 min
- Weight ↓ kgVolvo EX30 −64 kg
- Boot lVolvo EX30 +8 l
Technical data: Toyota Urban Cruiser vs Volvo EX30
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Toyota Urban Cruiser 61 FWD | Volvo EX30 P5 Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 426 km | 475 km | Volvo +49 km |
| Battery | 61 kWh | 69 kWh | Volvo +8 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.1 kWh/100 km | 17 kWh/100 km | Toyota −1.9 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 67 kW | 175 kW | Volvo +108 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 45 min | 27 min | Volvo −18 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 6.6 km/min | 12.3 km/min | Volvo +5.7 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 174 PS | 272 PS | Volvo +98 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.7 s | 5.3 s | Volvo −3.4 s |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 180 km/h | Volvo +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1839 kg | 1775 kg | Volvo −64 kg |
| Boot | 310 l | 318 l | Volvo +8 l |
| Length | 4285 mm | 4233 mm | Toyota +52 mm |
| Width | 1800 mm | 1837 mm | Volvo +37 mm |
| Height | 1635 mm | 1549 mm | Toyota +86 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2700 mm | 2650 mm | Toyota +50 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Toyota Urban Cruiser
Volvo EX30
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Toyota Urban Cruiser
Volvo EX30
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Toyota Urban Cruiser or Volvo EX30?
The Volvo EX30 goes further: 475 km WLTP against the 426 km of the Toyota Urban Cruiser. That is a difference of 49 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Toyota Urban Cruiser and the Volvo EX30 differ?
The Toyota Urban Cruiser has FWD and 174 PS. The Volvo EX30 has RWD and 272 PS.
Which is more powerful — Toyota Urban Cruiser or Volvo EX30?
The Volvo EX30 is stronger: 272 PS against the 174 PS of the Toyota Urban Cruiser. The gap is 98 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Toyota Urban Cruiser accepts up to 67 kW DC, the Volvo EX30 up to 175 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 45 and 27 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.