Volkswagen ID. Cross vs Volvo EX30
Biggest differences: DC charging — Volkswagen ID. Cross 105 kW, Volvo EX30 175 kW · Boot — Volkswagen ID. Cross 475 l, Volvo EX30 318 l · 0–100 km/h — Volkswagen ID. Cross 7.1 s, Volvo EX30 5.3 s.
Volkswagen ID. Cross
The Volkswagen ID. Cross is an all-electric compact SUV, offering three versions with varying power outputs and battery capacities.
Volvo EX30
The Volvo EX30 is an all-electric SUV in the B segment, offering a wide range of powertrain configurations with varying ranges and performance levels.
Profile against the market: Volkswagen ID. Cross vs Volvo EX30
Volkswagen ID. Cross52 kWh 155 kW
Volvo EX30P5 Long Range
Volkswagen ID. Cross or Volvo EX30 — who wins where
Volvo EX30 leads 6 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmVolvo EX30 +48 km
- Battery kWhVolvo EX30 +17 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmVolkswagen ID. Cross −2.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolvo EX30 +61 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolvo EX30 −1.8 s
- Top speed km/hVolvo EX30 +20 km/h
- DC charging kWVolvo EX30 +70 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minVolkswagen ID. Cross −3 min
- Weight ↓ kgVolkswagen ID. Cross −227 kg
- Boot lVolkswagen ID. Cross +157 l
Technical data: Volkswagen ID. Cross vs Volvo EX30
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Volkswagen ID. Cross52 kWh 155 kW | Volvo EX30P5 Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 427 km | 475 km | Volvo +48 km |
| Battery | 52 kWh | 69 kWh | Volvo +17 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.3 kWh/100 km | 17 kWh/100 km | Volkswagen −2.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 105 kW | 175 kW | Volvo +70 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 24 min | 27 min | Volkswagen −3 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 12.5 km/min | 12.3 km/min | Volkswagen +0.2 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 211 PS | 272 PS | Volvo +61 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.1 s | 5.3 s | Volvo −1.8 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 180 km/h | Volvo +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1548 kg | 1775 kg | Volkswagen −227 kg |
| Boot | 475 l | 318 l | Volkswagen +157 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Volkswagen |
| Length | 4153 mm | 4233 mm | Volvo +80 mm |
| Width | 1794 mm | 1837 mm | Volvo +43 mm |
| Height | 1581 mm | 1549 mm | Volkswagen +32 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2601 mm | 2650 mm | Volvo +49 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Volkswagen ID. Cross
Volvo EX30
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Volkswagen ID. Cross
Volvo EX30
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Volkswagen ID. Cross or Volvo EX30?
The Volvo EX30 goes further: 475 km WLTP against the 427 km of the Volkswagen ID. Cross. That is a difference of 48 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Volkswagen ID. Cross and the Volvo EX30 differ?
The Volkswagen ID. Cross has FWD and 211 PS. The Volvo EX30 has RWD and 272 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Volkswagen ID. Cross — its 52 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Volvo EX30, with 69 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Volkswagen ID. Cross takes more: 475 l against 318 l in the Volvo EX30. The difference is 157 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.




