Škoda Epiq vs Volvo EX30

Biggest differences: DC charging — Škoda Epiq 105 kW, Volvo EX30 175 kW · Boot — Škoda Epiq 475 l, Volvo EX30 318 l · 0–100 km/h — Škoda Epiq 7.1 s, Volvo EX30 5.3 s.

Škoda Epiq

The Škoda Epiq is an electric SUV in the B segment, offering three different motor configurations and battery capacities.

Volvo EX30

The Volvo EX30 is an all-electric SUV in the B segment, offering a wide range of powertrain configurations with varying ranges and performance levels.

Profile against the market: Škoda Epiq vs Volvo EX30

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Škoda Epiq or Volvo EX30 — who wins where

Volvo EX30 leads 6 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmVolvo EX30 +34 km
    Škoda Epiq
    441
    Volvo EX30
    475
  • Battery kWhVolvo EX30 +17 kWh
    Škoda Epiq
    52
    Volvo EX30
    69
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmŠkoda Epiq −3.3 kWh/100 km
    Škoda Epiq
    13.7
    Volvo EX30
    17
  • Power PSVolvo EX30 +61 PS
    Škoda Epiq
    211
    Volvo EX30
    272
  • 0–100 km/h sVolvo EX30 −1.8 s
    Škoda Epiq
    7.1
    Volvo EX30
    5.3
  • Top speed km/hVolvo EX30 +20 km/h
    Škoda Epiq
    160
    Volvo EX30
    180
  • DC charging kWVolvo EX30 +70 kW
    Škoda Epiq
    105
    Volvo EX30
    175
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Škoda Epiq
    11
    Volvo EX30
    11
  • Charging minŠkoda Epiq −3 min
    Škoda Epiq
    24
    Volvo EX30
    27
  • Weight kgŠkoda Epiq −232 kg
    Škoda Epiq
    1543
    Volvo EX30
    1775
  • Boot lŠkoda Epiq +157 l
    Škoda Epiq
    475
    Volvo EX30
    318

Add a third car

Technical data: Škoda Epiq vs Volvo EX30

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Škoda Epiq vs Volvo EX30
Key parameters Škoda Epiq
55
Volvo EX30
P5 Long Range
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range441 km475 kmVolvo +34 km
Battery52 kWh69 kWhVolvo +17 kWh
Consumption13.7 kWh/100 km17 kWh/100 kmŠkoda −3.3 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging105 kW175 kWVolvo +70 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%24 min27 minŠkoda −3 min
Range per minute of charging12.9 km/min12.3 km/minŠkoda +0.6 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power211 PS272 PSVolvo +61 PS
0–100 km/h7.1 s5.3 sVolvo −1.8 s
Top speed160 km/h180 km/hVolvo +20 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1543 kg1775 kgŠkoda −232 kg
Boot475 l318 lŠkoda +157 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly Škoda
Length4171 mm4233 mmVolvo +62 mm
Width1798 mm1837 mmVolvo +39 mm
Height1581 mm1549 mmŠkoda +32 mm
Wheelbase2601 mm2650 mmVolvo +49 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Škoda Epiq

Cost per 100 km4.11
Monthly51
Yearly616

Volvo EX30

Cost per 100 km5.1
Monthly64
Yearly765

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Škoda Epiq

Volvo EX30

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Škoda Epiq or Volvo EX30?

The Volvo EX30 goes further: 475 km WLTP against the 441 km of the Škoda Epiq. That is a difference of 34 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Škoda Epiq and the Volvo EX30 differ?

The Škoda Epiq has FWD and 211 PS. The Volvo EX30 has RWD and 272 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Škoda Epiq — its 52 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Volvo EX30, with 69 kWh, does not offer it.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Škoda Epiq takes more: 475 l against 318 l in the Volvo EX30. The difference is 157 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.