Škoda Epiq vs Volkswagen ID. Cross

Biggest differences: Consumption — Škoda Epiq 13.7 kWh/100 km, Volkswagen ID. Cross 14.3 kWh/100 km · WLTP range — Škoda Epiq 441 km, Volkswagen ID. Cross 427 km.

Škoda Epiq

The Škoda Epiq is an electric SUV in the B segment, offering three different motor configurations and battery capacities.

Volkswagen ID. Cross

The Volkswagen ID. Cross is an all-electric compact SUV, offering three versions with varying power outputs and battery capacities.

Profile against the market: Škoda Epiq vs Volkswagen ID. Cross

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Škoda Epiq or Volkswagen ID. Cross — who wins where

Škoda Epiq leads 3 to 0

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmŠkoda Epiq +14 km
    Škoda Epiq
    441
    Volkswagen ID. Cross
    427
  • Battery kWhNo difference
    Škoda Epiq
    52
    Volkswagen ID. Cross
    52
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmŠkoda Epiq −0.6 kWh/100 km
    Škoda Epiq
    13.7
    Volkswagen ID. Cross
    14.3
  • Power PSNo difference
    Škoda Epiq
    211
    Volkswagen ID. Cross
    211
  • 0–100 km/h sNo difference
    Škoda Epiq
    7.1
    Volkswagen ID. Cross
    7.1
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Škoda Epiq
    160
    Volkswagen ID. Cross
    160
  • DC charging kWNo difference
    Škoda Epiq
    105
    Volkswagen ID. Cross
    105
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Škoda Epiq
    11
    Volkswagen ID. Cross
    11
  • Charging minNo difference
    Škoda Epiq
    24
    Volkswagen ID. Cross
    24
  • Weight kgŠkoda Epiq −5 kg
    Škoda Epiq
    1543
    Volkswagen ID. Cross
    1548
  • Boot lNo difference
    Škoda Epiq
    475
    Volkswagen ID. Cross
    475

Add a third car

Technical data: Škoda Epiq vs Volkswagen ID. Cross

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Škoda Epiq vs Volkswagen ID. Cross
Key parameters Škoda Epiq
55
Volkswagen ID. Cross
52 kWh 155 kW
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range441 km427 kmŠkoda +14 km
Battery52 kWh52 kWhNo difference
Consumption13.7 kWh/100 km14.3 kWh/100 kmŠkoda −0.6 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging105 kW105 kWNo difference
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%24 min24 minNo difference
Range per minute of charging12.9 km/min12.5 km/minŠkoda +0.4 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power211 PS211 PSNo difference
0–100 km/h7.1 s7.1 sNo difference
Top speed160 km/h160 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1543 kg1548 kgŠkoda −5 kg
Boot475 l475 lNo difference
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4171 mm4153 mmŠkoda +18 mm
Width1798 mm1794 mmŠkoda +4 mm
Height1581 mm1581 mmNo difference
Wheelbase2601 mm2601 mmNo difference

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Škoda Epiq

Cost per 100 km4.11
Monthly51
Yearly616

Volkswagen ID. Cross

Cost per 100 km4.29
Monthly54
Yearly644

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Škoda Epiq

Volkswagen ID. Cross

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Škoda Epiq or Volkswagen ID. Cross?

The Škoda Epiq goes further: 441 km WLTP against the 427 km of the Volkswagen ID. Cross. That is a difference of 14 km.

Which charges faster?

The Škoda Epiq accepts up to 105 kW DC, the Volkswagen ID. Cross up to 105 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 24 and 24 min respectively.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Škoda Epiq uses less electricity: 13.7 kWh/100 km against 14.3 kWh/100 km in the Volkswagen ID. Cross. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 90 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.