Peugeot e-5008 vs Škoda Peaq
Škoda Peaq leads 7 to 2
Biggest differences: 0–100 km/h — Peugeot e-5008 9.6 s, Škoda Peaq 7.1 s · Boot — Peugeot e-5008 748 l, Škoda Peaq 935 l · DC charging — Peugeot e-5008 160 kW, Škoda Peaq 199 kW.
Peugeot e-5008
Peugeot e-5008 is a seven-seat D-segment SUV, in model year 2026 in three variants: WLTP range from 476 to 669 km, power from 214 to 325 hp.
Škoda Peaq
The Škoda Peaq is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering three drive variants with ranges reaching up to 647 km according to the WLTP standard.
Profile against the market: Peugeot e-5008 vs Škoda Peaq
Peugeot e-5008230 Long Range
Škoda Peaq90
Peugeot e-5008 or Škoda Peaq — who wins where
Škoda Peaq leads 7 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPeugeot e-5008 +22 km
- Battery kWhPeugeot e-5008 +10.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Peaq −3.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSŠkoda Peaq +55 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Peaq −2.5 s
- Top speed km/hŠkoda Peaq +10 km/h
- DC charging kWŠkoda Peaq +39 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgŠkoda Peaq −7 kg
- Boot lŠkoda Peaq +187 l
Technical data: Peugeot e-5008 vs Škoda Peaq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Peugeot e-5008 230 Long Range | Škoda Peaq 90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 669 km | 647 km | Peugeot +22 km |
| Battery | 96.9 kWh | 86 kWh | Peugeot +10.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.1 kWh/100 km | 15 kWh/100 km | Škoda −3.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 160 kW | 199 kW | Škoda +39 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 27 min 20–80% | 28 min 10–80% | 1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.9 km/min | 16.2 km/min | Škoda +1.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 231 PS | 286 PS | Škoda +55 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 9.6 s | 7.1 s | Škoda −2.5 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 180 km/h | Škoda +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2241 kg | 2234 kg | Škoda −7 kg |
| Boot | 748 l | 935 l | Škoda +187 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4791 mm | 4874 mm | Škoda +83 mm |
| Width | 1890 mm | 1867 mm | Peugeot +23 mm |
| Height | 1690 mm | 1664 mm | Peugeot +26 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2900 mm | 2965 mm | Škoda +65 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Peugeot e-5008
Škoda Peaq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Peugeot e-5008
Škoda Peaq
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Peugeot e-5008 or Škoda Peaq?
The Peugeot e-5008 goes further: 669 km WLTP against the 647 km of the Škoda Peaq. That is a difference of 22 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Peugeot e-5008 and the Škoda Peaq differ?
The Peugeot e-5008 has FWD and 231 PS. The Škoda Peaq has RWD and 286 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Škoda Peaq takes more: 935 l against 748 l in the Peugeot e-5008. The difference is 187 l.
Which charges faster?
The Peugeot e-5008 accepts up to 160 kW DC, the Škoda Peaq up to 199 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.