Peugeot e-5008 vs Tesla Model Y
Biggest differences: Boot — Peugeot e-5008 348 l, Tesla Model Y 822 l · Power — Peugeot e-5008 231 PS, Tesla Model Y 514 PS · 0–100 km/h — Peugeot e-5008 9.6 s, Tesla Model Y 4.8 s.
Peugeot e-5008
The Peugeot e-5008 is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering three different powertrain configurations and battery capacities.
Tesla Model Y
The Tesla Model Y is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering three different drive configurations with varying ranges and acceleration performance.
Profile against the market: Peugeot e-5008 vs Tesla Model Y
Peugeot e-5008230 Long Range
Tesla Model YPremium AWD
Peugeot e-5008 or Tesla Model Y — who wins where
Tesla Model Y leads 7 to 2
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPeugeot e-5008 +42 km
- Battery kWhPeugeot e-5008 +17.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmTesla Model Y −2.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSTesla Model Y +283 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sTesla Model Y −4.8 s
- Top speed km/hTesla Model Y +31 km/h
- DC charging kWTesla Model Y +90 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgTesla Model Y −244 kg
- Boot lTesla Model Y +474 l
Technical data: Peugeot e-5008 vs Tesla Model Y
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Peugeot e-5008 230 Long Range | Tesla Model Y Premium AWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 664 km | 622 km | Peugeot +42 km |
| Battery | 96.9 kWh | 79 kWh | Peugeot +17.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.1 kWh/100 km | 15.6 kWh/100 km | Tesla −2.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 160 kW | 250 kW | Tesla +90 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 20–80% ↓ | 27 min | — | — |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.8 km/min | — | — |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 231 PS | 514 PS | Tesla +283 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 9.6 s | 4.8 s | Tesla −4.8 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 201 km/h | Tesla +31 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2241 kg | 1997 kg | Tesla −244 kg |
| Boot | 348 l | 822 l | Tesla +474 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Peugeot |
| Length | 4791 mm | 4790 mm | Peugeot +1 mm |
| Width | 1890 mm | 1920 mm | Tesla +30 mm |
| Height | 1690 mm | 1624 mm | Peugeot +66 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2900 mm | 2890 mm | Peugeot +10 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Peugeot e-5008
Tesla Model Y
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Peugeot e-5008
Tesla Model Y
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Peugeot e-5008 or Tesla Model Y?
The Peugeot e-5008 goes further: 664 km WLTP against the 622 km of the Tesla Model Y. That is a difference of 42 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Peugeot e-5008 and the Tesla Model Y differ?
The Peugeot e-5008 has FWD and 231 PS. The Tesla Model Y has AWD and 514 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Peugeot e-5008 — its 96.9 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Tesla Model Y, with 79 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Peugeot e-5008 or Tesla Model Y?
The Tesla Model Y is stronger: 514 PS against the 231 PS of the Peugeot e-5008. The gap is 283 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.