Maserati Grecale Folgore vs Volvo EX90
Biggest differences: DC charging — Maserati Grecale Folgore 150 kW, Volvo EX90 350 kW · AC charging — Maserati Grecale Folgore 22 kW, Volvo EX90 11 kW · Boot — Maserati Grecale Folgore 535 l, Volvo EX90 324 l.
Maserati Grecale Folgore
The Maserati Grecale Folgore is an all-wheel-drive electric SUV offering a WLTP range of 580 kilometers and a power output of 557 horsepower.
Volvo EX90
The Volvo EX90 is an all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering three powertrain options with power ranging from 333 horsepower to 680 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Maserati Grecale Folgore vs Volvo EX90
Maserati Grecale Folgore105 kWh AWD
Volvo EX90Twin Motor
Maserati Grecale Folgore or Volvo EX90 — who wins where
Maserati Grecale Folgore leads 6 to 4
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmVolvo EX90 +45 km
- Battery kWhVolvo EX90 +1 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmVolvo EX90 −1.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSMaserati Grecale Folgore +101 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sMaserati Grecale Folgore −1.4 s
- Top speed km/hMaserati Grecale Folgore +40 km/h
- DC charging kWVolvo EX90 +200 kW
- AC charging kWMaserati Grecale Folgore +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgMaserati Grecale Folgore −135 kg
- Boot lMaserati Grecale Folgore +211 l
Technical data: Maserati Grecale Folgore vs Volvo EX90
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Maserati Grecale Folgore 105 kWh AWD | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 580 km | 625 km | Volvo +45 km |
| Battery | 105 kWh | 106 kWh | Volvo +1 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 20.9 kWh/100 km | 19.4 kWh/100 km | Volvo −1.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 150 kW | 350 kW | Volvo +200 kW |
| AC charging | 22 kW | 11 kW | Maserati +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | — | 22 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 19.9 km/min | — |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | Volvo +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 557 PS | 456 PS | Maserati +101 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.1 s | 5.5 s | Maserati −1.4 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h | 180 km/h | Maserati +40 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2555 kg | 2690 kg | Maserati −135 kg |
| Boot | 535 l | 324 l | Maserati +211 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Volvo |
| Length | 4865 mm | 5037 mm | Volvo +172 mm |
| Width | 1948 mm | 1964 mm | Volvo +16 mm |
| Height | 1651 mm | 1744 mm | Volvo +93 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2903 mm | 2985 mm | Volvo +82 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Maserati Grecale Folgore
Volvo EX90
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Maserati Grecale Folgore
Volvo EX90
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Maserati Grecale Folgore or Volvo EX90?
The Volvo EX90 goes further: 625 km WLTP against the 580 km of the Maserati Grecale Folgore. That is a difference of 45 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Volvo EX90 — its 106 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Maserati Grecale Folgore, with 105 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Maserati Grecale Folgore takes more: 535 l against 324 l in the Volvo EX90. The difference is 211 l.
Which charges faster?
The Maserati Grecale Folgore accepts up to 150 kW DC, the Volvo EX90 up to 350 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.