Maserati Grecale Folgore vs Polestar 3
Biggest differences: AC charging — Maserati Grecale Folgore 22 kW, Polestar 3 11 kW · DC charging — Maserati Grecale Folgore 150 kW, Polestar 3 250 kW · 0–100 km/h — Maserati Grecale Folgore 4.1 s, Polestar 3 5 s.
Maserati Grecale Folgore
The Maserati Grecale Folgore is an all-wheel-drive electric SUV offering a WLTP range of 580 kilometers and a power output of 557 horsepower.
Polestar 3
An all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering three drive variants with power ranging from 333 horsepower to 680 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Maserati Grecale Folgore vs Polestar 3
Maserati Grecale Folgore105 kWh AWD
Polestar 3Long Range Dual Motor
Maserati Grecale Folgore or Polestar 3 — who wins where
Maserati Grecale Folgore leads 6 to 4
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPolestar 3 +67 km
- Battery kWhPolestar 3 +2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmPolestar 3 −1.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSMaserati Grecale Folgore +68 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sMaserati Grecale Folgore −0.9 s
- Top speed km/hMaserati Grecale Folgore +10 km/h
- DC charging kWPolestar 3 +100 kW
- AC charging kWMaserati Grecale Folgore +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgMaserati Grecale Folgore −29 kg
- Boot lMaserati Grecale Folgore +51 l
Technical data: Maserati Grecale Folgore vs Polestar 3
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Maserati Grecale Folgore105 kWh AWD | Polestar 3Long Range Dual Motor | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 580 km | 647 km | Polestar +67 km |
| Battery | 105 kWh | 107 kWh | Polestar +2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 20.9 kWh/100 km | 19.6 kWh/100 km | Polestar −1.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 150 kW | 250 kW | Polestar +100 kW |
| AC charging | 22 kW | 11 kW | Maserati +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | — | 30 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 15.1 km/min | — |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 557 PS | 489 PS | Maserati +68 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.1 s | 5 s | Maserati −0.9 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h | 210 km/h | Maserati +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2555 kg | 2584 kg | Maserati −29 kg |
| Boot | 535 l | 484 l | Maserati +51 l |
| Length | 4865 mm | 4900 mm | Polestar +35 mm |
| Width | 1948 mm | 1968 mm | Polestar +20 mm |
| Height | 1651 mm | 1614 mm | Maserati +37 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2903 mm | 2985 mm | Polestar +82 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Maserati Grecale Folgore
Polestar 3
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Maserati Grecale Folgore
Polestar 3
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Maserati Grecale Folgore or Polestar 3?
The Polestar 3 goes further: 647 km WLTP against the 580 km of the Maserati Grecale Folgore. That is a difference of 67 km.
Which charges faster?
The Maserati Grecale Folgore accepts up to 150 kW DC, the Polestar 3 up to 250 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Polestar 3 uses less electricity: 19.6 kWh/100 km against 20.9 kWh/100 km in the Maserati Grecale Folgore. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 195 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.



