Leapmotor B10 vs Omoda E5

Biggest differences: Boot — Leapmotor B10 430 l, Omoda E5 300 l · Charging 30–80% — Leapmotor B10 20 min, Omoda E5 28 min · DC charging — Leapmotor B10 100 kW, Omoda E5 130 kW.

Leapmotor B10

The Leapmotor B10 is a compact SUV with rear-wheel drive, offering a WLTP range of up to 434 kilometers in the Long Range version.

Omoda E5

The Omoda E5 is an SUV in the C segment with front-wheel drive and a 61 kWh battery.

Profile against the market: Leapmotor B10 vs Omoda E5

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Leapmotor B10 or Omoda E5 — who wins where

It's a tie: 5 to 5

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmLeapmotor B10 +4 km
    Leapmotor B10
    434
    Omoda E5
    430
  • Battery kWhLeapmotor B10 +6.1 kWh
    Leapmotor B10
    67.1
    Omoda E5
    61
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmOmoda E5 −1.8 kWh/100 km
    Leapmotor B10
    17.3
    Omoda E5
    15.5
  • Power PSLeapmotor B10 +7 PS
    Leapmotor B10
    218
    Omoda E5
    211
  • 0–100 km/h sOmoda E5 −0.4 s
    Leapmotor B10
    8
    Omoda E5
    7.6
  • Top speed km/hOmoda E5 +1 km/h
    Leapmotor B10
    170
    Omoda E5
    171
  • DC charging kWOmoda E5 +30 kW
    Leapmotor B10
    100
    Omoda E5
    130
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Leapmotor B10
    11
    Omoda E5
    11
  • Charging minLeapmotor B10 −8 min
    Leapmotor B10
    20
    Omoda E5
    28
  • Weight kgOmoda E5 −135 kg
    Leapmotor B10
    1845
    Omoda E5
    1710
  • Boot lLeapmotor B10 +130 l
    Leapmotor B10
    430
    Omoda E5
    300

Add a third car

Technical data: Leapmotor B10 vs Omoda E5

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Leapmotor B10 vs Omoda E5
Key parameters Leapmotor B10
Long Range
Omoda E5
E5
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range434 km430 kmLeapmotor +4 km
Battery67.1 kWh61 kWhLeapmotor +6.1 kWh
Consumption17.3 kWh/100 km15.5 kWh/100 kmOmoda −1.8 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW130 kWOmoda +30 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 30–80%20 min28 minLeapmotor −8 min
Range per minute of charging10.9 km/min7.7 km/minLeapmotor +3.2 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power218 PS211 PSLeapmotor +7 PS
0–100 km/h8 s7.6 sOmoda −0.4 s
Top speed170 km/h171 km/hOmoda +1 km/h
DrivetrainRWDFWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1845 kg1710 kgOmoda −135 kg
Boot430 l300 lLeapmotor +130 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4515 mm4424 mmLeapmotor +91 mm
Width1885 mm1830 mmLeapmotor +55 mm
Height1655 mm1588 mmLeapmotor +67 mm
Wheelbase2735 mm2630 mmLeapmotor +105 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Leapmotor B10

Cost per 100 km5.19
Monthly65
Yearly779

Omoda E5

Cost per 100 km4.65
Monthly58
Yearly697

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Leapmotor B10

Omoda E5

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

How do the drivetrains of the Leapmotor B10 and the Omoda E5 differ?

The Leapmotor B10 has RWD and 218 PS. The Omoda E5 has FWD and 211 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Leapmotor B10 takes more: 430 l against 300 l in the Omoda E5. The difference is 130 l.

Which charges faster?

The Leapmotor B10 accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Omoda E5 up to 130 kW. Charging from 30 to 80% takes 20 and 28 min respectively.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Omoda E5 uses less electricity: 15.5 kWh/100 km against 17.3 kWh/100 km in the Leapmotor B10. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 270 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.