Leapmotor B10 vs Škoda Elroq
Škoda Elroq leads 7 to 2
Biggest differences: Power — Leapmotor B10 218 PS, Škoda Elroq 299 PS · WLTP range — Leapmotor B10 434 km, Škoda Elroq 576 km · 0–100 km/h — Leapmotor B10 8 s, Škoda Elroq 6.2 s.
Leapmotor B10
The Leapmotor B10 is an all-electric C-segment SUV with rear-wheel drive (RWD): it offers 218 horsepower, a range of up to 434 km according to the WLTP standard, and supports DC fast charging up to 168 kW.
Škoda Elroq
The Škoda Elroq is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, available with either RWD or AWD: it offers power outputs ranging from 190 to 340 horsepower, a range of up to 576 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 165 kW.
Profile against the market: Leapmotor B10 vs Škoda Elroq
Leapmotor B10Long Range
Škoda Elroq85x
Leapmotor B10 or Škoda Elroq — who wins where
Škoda Elroq leads 7 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmŠkoda Elroq +142 km
- Battery kWhŠkoda Elroq +9.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Elroq −1.8 kWh/100 km
- Power PSŠkoda Elroq +81 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Elroq −1.8 s
- Top speed km/hŠkoda Elroq +10 km/h
- DC charging kWLeapmotor B10 +3 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgLeapmotor B10 −287 kg
- Boot lŠkoda Elroq +40 l
Technical data: Leapmotor B10 vs Škoda Elroq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Leapmotor B10 Long Range | Škoda Elroq 85x | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 434 km | 576 km | Škoda +142 km |
| Battery | 67.1 kWh | 77 kWh | Škoda +9.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.3 kWh/100 km | 15.5 kWh/100 km | Škoda −1.8 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 168 kW | 165 kW | Leapmotor +3 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 18 min 30–80% | 29 min 10–80% | 11 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 12.1 km/min | 13.9 km/min | Škoda +1.8 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 218 PS | 299 PS | Škoda +81 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8 s | 6.2 s | Škoda −1.8 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 180 km/h | Škoda +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1845 kg | 2132 kg | Leapmotor −287 kg |
| Boot | 430 l | 470 l | Škoda +40 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4515 mm | 4488 mm | Leapmotor +27 mm |
| Width | 1885 mm | 1884 mm | Leapmotor +1 mm |
| Height | 1655 mm | 1620 mm | Leapmotor +35 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2735 mm | 2766 mm | Škoda +31 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Leapmotor B10
Škoda Elroq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Leapmotor B10
Škoda Elroq
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Leapmotor B10 or Škoda Elroq?
The Škoda Elroq goes further: 576 km WLTP against the 434 km of the Leapmotor B10. That is a difference of 142 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Leapmotor B10 and the Škoda Elroq differ?
The Leapmotor B10 has RWD and 218 PS. The Škoda Elroq has AWD and 299 PS.
Which is more powerful — Leapmotor B10 or Škoda Elroq?
The Škoda Elroq is stronger: 299 PS against the 218 PS of the Leapmotor B10. The gap is 81 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Leapmotor B10 accepts up to 168 kW DC, the Škoda Elroq up to 165 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.