Lancia Gamma vs Lynk & Co 02

Lancia Gamma leads 6 to 4

Biggest differences: WLTP range — Lancia Gamma 741 km, Lynk & Co 02 445 km · AC charging — Lancia Gamma 7 kW, Lynk & Co 02 11 kW · Battery — Lancia Gamma 97.2 kWh, Lynk & Co 02 66 kWh.

Lancia Gamma

The Lancia Gamma is an all-electric crossover in the C segment, available in three versions: with a WLTP range of 543 to 741 km, power ranging from 230 to 350 horsepower, and DC fast charging at 160 kW.

Lynk & Co 02

The Lynk & Co 02 Long Range (Model Year 2025) is a compact SUV with rear-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 445 kilometers.

Profile against the market: Lancia Gamma vs Lynk & Co 02

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Lancia Gamma or Lynk & Co 02 — who wins where

Lancia Gamma leads 6 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmLancia Gamma +296 km
    Lancia Gamma
    741
    Lynk & Co 02
    445
  • Battery kWhLancia Gamma +31.2 kWh
    Lancia Gamma
    97.2
    Lynk & Co 02
    66
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmLancia Gamma −0.9 kWh/100 km
    Lancia Gamma
    16.2
    Lynk & Co 02
    17.1
  • Power PSLynk & Co 02 +27 PS
    Lancia Gamma
    245
    Lynk & Co 02
    272
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sLynk & Co 02 −2.3 s
    Lancia Gamma
    7.8
    Lynk & Co 02
    5.5
  • Top speed km/hLancia Gamma +10 km/h
    Lancia Gamma
    190
    Lynk & Co 02
    180
  • DC charging kWLancia Gamma +10 kW
    Lancia Gamma
    160
    Lynk & Co 02
    150
  • AC charging kWLynk & Co 02 +4 kW
    Lancia Gamma
    7
    Lynk & Co 02
    11
  • Weight ↓ kgLynk & Co 02 −315 kg
    Lancia Gamma
    2135
    Lynk & Co 02
    1820
  • Boot lLancia Gamma +150 l
    Lancia Gamma
    560
    Lynk & Co 02
    410

Add a third car

Technical data: Lancia Gamma vs Lynk & Co 02

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Lancia Gamma vs Lynk & Co 02
Key parameters Lancia Gamma
Long Range
Lynk & Co 02
Long Range
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range741 km445 kmLancia +296 km
Battery97.2 kWh66 kWhLancia +31.2 kWh
Consumption ↓16.2 kWh/100 km17.1 kWh/100 kmLancia −0.9 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging160 kW150 kWLancia +10 kW
AC charging7 kW11 kWLynk & Co +4 kW
Charging ⚠27 min 20–80%30 min 10–80%3 min
Range per minute of charging16.5 km/min10.4 km/minLancia +6.1 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power245 PS272 PSLynk & Co +27 PS
0–100 km/h ↓7.8 s5.5 sLynk & Co −2.3 s
Top speed190 km/h180 km/hLancia +10 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓2135 kg1820 kgLynk & Co −315 kg
Boot560 l410 lLancia +150 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length4672 mm4460 mmLancia +212 mm
Width1898 mm1845 mmLancia +53 mm
Height1664 mm1573 mmLancia +91 mm
Wheelbase2791 mm2755 mmLancia +36 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Lancia Gamma

Cost per 100 km4.86
Monthly61
Yearly729

Lynk & Co 02

Cost per 100 km5.13
Monthly64
Yearly770

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Lancia Gamma

Lynk & Co 02

Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Lancia Gamma or Lynk & Co 02?

The Lancia Gamma goes further: 741 km WLTP against the 445 km of the Lynk & Co 02. That is a difference of 296 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Lancia Gamma and the Lynk & Co 02 differ?

The Lancia Gamma has FWD and 245 PS. The Lynk & Co 02 has RWD and 272 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Lancia Gamma takes more: 560 l against 410 l in the Lynk & Co 02. The difference is 150 l.

Which charges faster?

The Lancia Gamma accepts up to 160 kW DC, the Lynk & Co 02 up to 150 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.