Lynk & Co 02 vs Smart #1
Biggest differences: AC charging — Lynk & Co 02 11 kW, Smart #1 22 kW · 0–100 km/h — Lynk & Co 02 5.5 s, Smart #1 6.7 s · Consumption — Lynk & Co 02 17.1 kWh/100 km, Smart #1 16.4 kWh/100 km.
Lynk & Co 02
The Lynk & Co 02 Long Range (Model Year 2025) is a compact SUV with rear-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 445 kilometers.
Smart #1
The Smart #1 is an electric SUV in the C segment, offering three different motor configurations and battery capacities.
Profile against the market: Lynk & Co 02 vs Smart #1
Lynk & Co 02Long Range
Smart #1Pro+
Lynk & Co 02 or Smart #1 — who wins where
Smart #1 leads 3 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmLynk & Co 02 +5 km
- Battery kWhNo difference
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmSmart #1 −0.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNo difference
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sLynk & Co 02 −1.2 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWSmart #1 +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgNo difference
- Boot lSmart #1 +1 l
Technical data: Lynk & Co 02 vs Smart #1
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Lynk & Co 02 Long Range | Smart #1 Pro+ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 445 km | 440 km | Lynk & Co +5 km |
| Battery | 66 kWh | 66 kWh | No difference |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.1 kWh/100 km | 16.4 kWh/100 km | Smart −0.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 150 kW | 150 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Smart +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 30 min | 30 min | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 10.4 km/min | 10.3 km/min | Lynk & Co +0.1 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 272 PS | 272 PS | No difference |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 5.5 s | 6.7 s | Lynk & Co −1.2 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1820 kg | 1820 kg | No difference |
| Boot | 410 l | 411 l | Smart +1 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4460 mm | 4270 mm | Lynk & Co +190 mm |
| Width | 1845 mm | 1822 mm | Lynk & Co +23 mm |
| Height | 1573 mm | 1636 mm | Smart +63 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2755 mm | 2750 mm | Lynk & Co +5 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Lynk & Co 02
Smart #1
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Lynk & Co 02
Smart #1
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which charges faster?
The Lynk & Co 02 accepts up to 150 kW DC, the Smart #1 up to 150 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 30 and 30 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Smart #1 uses less electricity: 16.4 kWh/100 km against 17.1 kWh/100 km in the Lynk & Co 02. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 105 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.