Škoda Elroq vs Smart #1

Biggest differences: AC charging — Škoda Elroq 11 kW, Smart #1 22 kW · WLTP range — Škoda Elroq 573 km, Smart #1 440 km · Battery — Škoda Elroq 77 kWh, Smart #1 66 kWh.

Škoda Elroq

The Škoda Elroq is a compact SUV in the C-segment, offering rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive options, and power outputs ranging from 170 to 340 horsepower.

Smart #1

The Smart #1 is an electric SUV in the C segment, offering three different motor configurations and battery capacities.

Profile against the market: Škoda Elroq vs Smart #1

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Škoda Elroq or Smart #1 — who wins where

Škoda Elroq leads 7 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmŠkoda Elroq +133 km
    Škoda Elroq
    573
    Smart #1
    440
  • Battery kWhŠkoda Elroq +11 kWh
    Škoda Elroq
    77
    Smart #1
    66
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmŠkoda Elroq −1.2 kWh/100 km
    Škoda Elroq
    15.2
    Smart #1
    16.4
  • Power PSŠkoda Elroq +14 PS
    Škoda Elroq
    286
    Smart #1
    272
  • 0–100 km/h sŠkoda Elroq −0.1 s
    Škoda Elroq
    6.6
    Smart #1
    6.7
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Škoda Elroq
    180
    Smart #1
    180
  • DC charging kWSmart #1 +15 kW
    Škoda Elroq
    135
    Smart #1
    150
  • AC charging kWSmart #1 +11 kW
    Škoda Elroq
    11
    Smart #1
    22
  • Charging minŠkoda Elroq −2 min
    Škoda Elroq
    28
    Smart #1
    30
  • Weight kgSmart #1 −230 kg
    Škoda Elroq
    2050
    Smart #1
    1820
  • Boot lŠkoda Elroq +59 l
    Škoda Elroq
    470
    Smart #1
    411

Add a third car

Technical data: Škoda Elroq vs Smart #1

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Škoda Elroq vs Smart #1
Key parameters Škoda Elroq
85
Smart #1
Pro+
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range573 km440 kmŠkoda +133 km
Battery77 kWh66 kWhŠkoda +11 kWh
Consumption15.2 kWh/100 km16.4 kWh/100 kmŠkoda −1.2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging135 kW150 kWSmart +15 kW
AC charging11 kW22 kWSmart +11 kW
Charging 10–80%28 min30 minŠkoda −2 min
Range per minute of charging14.3 km/min10.3 km/minŠkoda +4 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power286 PS272 PSŠkoda +14 PS
0–100 km/h6.6 s6.7 sŠkoda −0.1 s
Top speed180 km/h180 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainRWDRWD
Practicality
Weight2050 kg1820 kgSmart −230 kg
Boot470 l411 lŠkoda +59 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Smart
Length4488 mm4270 mmŠkoda +218 mm
Width1884 mm1822 mmŠkoda +62 mm
Height1625 mm1636 mmSmart +11 mm
Wheelbase2765 mm2750 mmŠkoda +15 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Škoda Elroq

Cost per 100 km4.56
Monthly57
Yearly684

Smart #1

Cost per 100 km4.92
Monthly61
Yearly738

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Škoda Elroq

Smart #1

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Škoda Elroq or Smart #1?

The Škoda Elroq goes further: 573 km WLTP against the 440 km of the Smart #1. That is a difference of 133 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Smart #1 — its 66 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Škoda Elroq, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Škoda Elroq takes more: 470 l against 411 l in the Smart #1. The difference is 59 l.

Which charges faster?

The Škoda Elroq accepts up to 135 kW DC, the Smart #1 up to 150 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 28 and 30 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.