Škoda Elroq vs Smart #1
Škoda Elroq leads 8 to 2
Biggest differences: AC charging — Škoda Elroq 11 kW, Smart #1 22 kW · Boot — Škoda Elroq 470 l, Smart #1 323 l · WLTP range — Škoda Elroq 576 km, Smart #1 440 km.
Škoda Elroq
The Škoda Elroq is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, available with either RWD or AWD: it offers power outputs ranging from 190 to 340 horsepower, a range of up to 576 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 165 kW.
Smart #1
The Smart #1 is an electric C-segment SUV in three variants: WLTP range from 310 to 440 km, power from 272 to 428 hp.
Profile against the market: Škoda Elroq vs Smart #1
Škoda Elroq85x
Smart #1Pro+
Škoda Elroq or Smart #1 — who wins where
Škoda Elroq leads 8 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmŠkoda Elroq +136 km
- Battery kWhŠkoda Elroq +11 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Elroq −0.9 kWh/100 km
- Power PSŠkoda Elroq +27 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Elroq −0.5 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWŠkoda Elroq +15 kW
- AC charging kWSmart #1 +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minŠkoda Elroq −1 min
- Weight ↓ kgSmart #1 −312 kg
- Boot lŠkoda Elroq +147 l
Technical data: Škoda Elroq vs Smart #1
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Škoda Elroq 85x | Smart #1 Pro+ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 576 km | 440 km | Škoda +136 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 66 kWh | Škoda +11 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.5 kWh/100 km | 16.4 kWh/100 km | Škoda −0.9 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 165 kW | 150 kW | Škoda +15 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Smart +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 29 min | 30 min | Škoda −1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 13.9 km/min | 10.3 km/min | Škoda +3.6 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 299 PS | 272 PS | Škoda +27 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.2 s | 6.7 s | Škoda −0.5 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2132 kg | 1820 kg | Smart −312 kg |
| Boot | 470 l | 323 l | Škoda +147 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4488 mm | 4270 mm | Škoda +218 mm |
| Width | 1884 mm | 1822 mm | Škoda +62 mm |
| Height | 1620 mm | 1636 mm | Smart +16 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2766 mm | 2750 mm | Škoda +16 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Škoda Elroq
Smart #1
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Škoda Elroq
Smart #1
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Škoda Elroq or Smart #1?
The Škoda Elroq goes further: 576 km WLTP against the 440 km of the Smart #1. That is a difference of 136 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Škoda Elroq and the Smart #1 differ?
The Škoda Elroq has AWD and 299 PS. The Smart #1 has RWD and 272 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Škoda Elroq takes more: 470 l against 323 l in the Smart #1. The difference is 147 l.
Which charges faster?
The Škoda Elroq accepts up to 165 kW DC, the Smart #1 up to 150 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 29 and 30 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.