Smart #1 vs Volvo EX30

Biggest differences: AC charging — Smart #1 22 kW, Volvo EX30 11 kW · Boot — Smart #1 411 l, Volvo EX30 318 l · 0–100 km/h — Smart #1 6.7 s, Volvo EX30 5.3 s.

Smart #1

The Smart #1 is an electric SUV in the C segment, offering three different motor configurations and battery capacities.

Volvo EX30

The Volvo EX30 is an all-electric SUV in the B segment, offering a wide range of powertrain configurations with varying ranges and performance levels.

Profile against the market: Smart #1 vs Volvo EX30

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Smart #1 or Volvo EX30 — who wins where

Volvo EX30 leads 6 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmVolvo EX30 +35 km
    Smart #1
    440
    Volvo EX30
    475
  • Battery kWhVolvo EX30 +3 kWh
    Smart #1
    66
    Volvo EX30
    69
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmSmart #1 −0.6 kWh/100 km
    Smart #1
    16.4
    Volvo EX30
    17
  • Power PSNo difference
    Smart #1
    272
    Volvo EX30
    272
  • 0–100 km/h sVolvo EX30 −1.4 s
    Smart #1
    6.7
    Volvo EX30
    5.3
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Smart #1
    180
    Volvo EX30
    180
  • DC charging kWVolvo EX30 +25 kW
    Smart #1
    150
    Volvo EX30
    175
  • AC charging kWSmart #1 +11 kW
    Smart #1
    22
    Volvo EX30
    11
  • Charging minVolvo EX30 −3 min
    Smart #1
    30
    Volvo EX30
    27
  • Weight kgVolvo EX30 −45 kg
    Smart #1
    1820
    Volvo EX30
    1775
  • Boot lSmart #1 +93 l
    Smart #1
    411
    Volvo EX30
    318

Add a third car

Technical data: Smart #1 vs Volvo EX30

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Smart #1 vs Volvo EX30
Key parameters Smart #1
Pro+
Volvo EX30
P5 Long Range
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range440 km475 kmVolvo +35 km
Battery66 kWh69 kWhVolvo +3 kWh
Consumption16.4 kWh/100 km17 kWh/100 kmSmart −0.6 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging150 kW175 kWVolvo +25 kW
AC charging22 kW11 kWSmart +11 kW
Charging 10–80%30 min27 minVolvo −3 min
Range per minute of charging10.3 km/min12.3 km/minVolvo +2 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power272 PS272 PSNo difference
0–100 km/h6.7 s5.3 sVolvo −1.4 s
Top speed180 km/h180 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainRWDRWD
Practicality
Weight1820 kg1775 kgVolvo −45 kg
Boot411 l318 lSmart +93 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly Smart
Length4270 mm4233 mmSmart +37 mm
Width1822 mm1837 mmVolvo +15 mm
Height1636 mm1549 mmSmart +87 mm
Wheelbase2750 mm2650 mmSmart +100 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Smart #1

Cost per 100 km4.92
Monthly61
Yearly738

Volvo EX30

Cost per 100 km5.1
Monthly64
Yearly765

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Smart #1

Volvo EX30

Other comparisons in this class

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Smart #1 or Volvo EX30?

The Volvo EX30 goes further: 475 km WLTP against the 440 km of the Smart #1. That is a difference of 35 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Smart #1 — its 66 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Volvo EX30, with 69 kWh, does not offer it.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Smart #1 takes more: 411 l against 318 l in the Volvo EX30. The difference is 93 l.

Which charges faster?

The Smart #1 accepts up to 150 kW DC, the Volvo EX30 up to 175 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 30 and 27 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.