Jeep Avenger vs Opel Mokka Electric

Jeep Avenger leads 3 to 2

Biggest differences: Boot — Jeep Avenger 355 l, Opel Mokka Electric 310 l · Weight — Jeep Avenger 1520 kg, Opel Mokka Electric 1615 kg · Battery — Jeep Avenger 51 kWh, Opel Mokka Electric 54 kWh.

Jeep Avenger

The Jeep Avenger is an all-electric SUV in the B segment, offering front-wheel drive and a range of up to 400 kilometers according to the WLTP cycle.

Opel Mokka Electric

The Opel Mokka Electric is an all-electric subcompact crossover offering two different powertrain options with varying power outputs and ranges.

Profile against the market: Jeep Avenger vs Opel Mokka Electric

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Jeep Avenger or Opel Mokka Electric — who wins where

Jeep Avenger leads 3 to 2

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmOpel Mokka Electric +3 km
    Jeep Avenger
    400
    Opel Mokka Electric
    403
  • Battery kWhOpel Mokka Electric +3 kWh
    Jeep Avenger
    51
    Opel Mokka Electric
    54
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmJeep Avenger −0.1 kWh/100 km
    Jeep Avenger
    15.5
    Opel Mokka Electric
    15.6
  • Power PSNo difference
    Jeep Avenger
    156
    Opel Mokka Electric
    156
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo difference
    Jeep Avenger
    9
    Opel Mokka Electric
    9
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Jeep Avenger
    150
    Opel Mokka Electric
    150
  • DC charging kWNo difference
    Jeep Avenger
    100
    Opel Mokka Electric
    100
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Jeep Avenger
    11
    Opel Mokka Electric
    11
  • Weight ↓ kgJeep Avenger −95 kg
    Jeep Avenger
    1520
    Opel Mokka Electric
    1615
  • Boot lJeep Avenger +45 l
    Jeep Avenger
    355
    Opel Mokka Electric
    310

Add a third car

Technical data: Jeep Avenger vs Opel Mokka Electric

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Jeep Avenger vs Opel Mokka Electric
Key parameters Jeep Avenger
Electric
Opel Mokka Electric
54 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range400 km403 kmOpel +3 km
Battery51 kWh54 kWhOpel +3 kWh
Consumption ↓15.5 kWh/100 km15.6 kWh/100 kmJeep −0.1 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW100 kWNo difference
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging ⚠30 min 10–80%27 min 20–80%3 min
Range per minute of charging9.3 km/min9 km/minJeep +0.3 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power156 PS156 PSNo difference
0–100 km/h ↓9 s9 sNo difference
Top speed150 km/h150 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainFWDFWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓1520 kg1615 kgJeep −95 kg
Boot355 l310 lJeep +45 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Opel
Length4084 mm4150 mmOpel +66 mm
Width1776 mm1787 mmOpel +11 mm
Height1527 mm1535 mmOpel +8 mm
Wheelbase2562 mm2557 mmJeep +5 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Jeep Avenger

Cost per 100 km4.65
Monthly58
Yearly697

Opel Mokka Electric

Cost per 100 km4.68
Monthly59
Yearly702

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Jeep Avenger

Opel Mokka Electric

Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Opel Mokka Electric — its 54 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Jeep Avenger, with 51 kWh, does not offer it.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Jeep Avenger takes more: 355 l against 310 l in the Opel Mokka Electric. The difference is 45 l.

Which charges faster?

The Jeep Avenger accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Opel Mokka Electric up to 100 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.