Jeep Avenger vs Volvo EX30

Biggest differences: DC charging — Jeep Avenger 100 kW, Volvo EX30 175 kW · Power — Jeep Avenger 156 PS, Volvo EX30 272 PS · 0–100 km/h — Jeep Avenger 9 s, Volvo EX30 5.3 s.

Jeep Avenger

The Jeep Avenger is an all-electric SUV in the B segment, offering front-wheel drive and a range of up to 400 kilometers according to the WLTP cycle.

Volvo EX30

The Volvo EX30 is an all-electric SUV in the B segment, offering a wide range of powertrain configurations with varying ranges and performance levels.

Profile against the market: Jeep Avenger vs Volvo EX30

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Jeep Avenger or Volvo EX30 — who wins where

Volvo EX30 leads 7 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmVolvo EX30 +75 km
    Jeep Avenger
    400
    Volvo EX30
    475
  • Battery kWhVolvo EX30 +18 kWh
    Jeep Avenger
    51
    Volvo EX30
    69
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmJeep Avenger −1.5 kWh/100 km
    Jeep Avenger
    15.5
    Volvo EX30
    17
  • Power PSVolvo EX30 +116 PS
    Jeep Avenger
    156
    Volvo EX30
    272
  • 0–100 km/h sVolvo EX30 −3.7 s
    Jeep Avenger
    9
    Volvo EX30
    5.3
  • Top speed km/hVolvo EX30 +30 km/h
    Jeep Avenger
    150
    Volvo EX30
    180
  • DC charging kWVolvo EX30 +75 kW
    Jeep Avenger
    100
    Volvo EX30
    175
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Jeep Avenger
    11
    Volvo EX30
    11
  • Charging minVolvo EX30 −3 min
    Jeep Avenger
    30
    Volvo EX30
    27
  • Weight kgJeep Avenger −255 kg
    Jeep Avenger
    1520
    Volvo EX30
    1775
  • Boot lJeep Avenger +37 l
    Jeep Avenger
    355
    Volvo EX30
    318

Add a third car

Technical data: Jeep Avenger vs Volvo EX30

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Jeep Avenger vs Volvo EX30
Key parameters Jeep Avenger
Electric
Volvo EX30
P5 Long Range
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range400 km475 kmVolvo +75 km
Battery51 kWh69 kWhVolvo +18 kWh
Consumption15.5 kWh/100 km17 kWh/100 kmJeep −1.5 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW175 kWVolvo +75 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%30 min27 minVolvo −3 min
Range per minute of charging9.3 km/min12.3 km/minVolvo +3 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power156 PS272 PSVolvo +116 PS
0–100 km/h9 s5.3 sVolvo −3.7 s
Top speed150 km/h180 km/hVolvo +30 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1520 kg1775 kgJeep −255 kg
Boot355 l318 lJeep +37 l
Length4084 mm4233 mmVolvo +149 mm
Width1776 mm1837 mmVolvo +61 mm
Height1527 mm1549 mmVolvo +22 mm
Wheelbase2562 mm2650 mmVolvo +88 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Jeep Avenger

Cost per 100 km4.65
Monthly58
Yearly697

Volvo EX30

Cost per 100 km5.1
Monthly64
Yearly765

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Jeep Avenger

Volvo EX30

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Jeep Avenger or Volvo EX30?

The Volvo EX30 goes further: 475 km WLTP against the 400 km of the Jeep Avenger. That is a difference of 75 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Jeep Avenger and the Volvo EX30 differ?

The Jeep Avenger has FWD and 156 PS. The Volvo EX30 has RWD and 272 PS.

Which is more powerful — Jeep Avenger or Volvo EX30?

The Volvo EX30 is stronger: 272 PS against the 156 PS of the Jeep Avenger. The gap is 116 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Jeep Avenger takes more: 355 l against 318 l in the Volvo EX30. The difference is 37 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.