Jaecoo 5 EV vs Jeep Avenger

Jaecoo 5 EV leads 8 to 2

Biggest differences: Power — Jaecoo 5 EV 211 PS, Jeep Avenger 156 PS · Boot — Jaecoo 5 EV 480 l, Jeep Avenger 355 l · DC charging — Jaecoo 5 EV 130 kW, Jeep Avenger 100 kW.

Jaecoo 5 EV

Jaecoo 5 EV is a B-segment SUV with front-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 402 km.

Jeep Avenger

The Jeep Avenger is an all-electric SUV in the B segment, offering front-wheel drive and a range of up to 400 kilometers according to the WLTP cycle.

Profile against the market: Jaecoo 5 EV vs Jeep Avenger

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Jaecoo 5 EV or Jeep Avenger — who wins where

Jaecoo 5 EV leads 8 to 2

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmJaecoo 5 EV +2 km
    Jaecoo 5 EV
    402
    Jeep Avenger
    400
  • Battery kWhJaecoo 5 EV +10 kWh
    Jaecoo 5 EV
    61
    Jeep Avenger
    51
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmJaecoo 5 EV −1.6 kWh/100 km
    Jaecoo 5 EV
    13.9
    Jeep Avenger
    15.5
  • Power PSJaecoo 5 EV +55 PS
    Jaecoo 5 EV
    211
    Jeep Avenger
    156
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sJaecoo 5 EV −1.3 s
    Jaecoo 5 EV
    7.7
    Jeep Avenger
    9
  • Top speed km/hJaecoo 5 EV +25 km/h
    Jaecoo 5 EV
    175
    Jeep Avenger
    150
  • DC charging kWJaecoo 5 EV +30 kW
    Jaecoo 5 EV
    130
    Jeep Avenger
    100
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Jaecoo 5 EV
    11
    Jeep Avenger
    11
  • Charging ↓ minJeep Avenger −4 min
    Jaecoo 5 EV
    34
    Jeep Avenger
    30
  • Weight ↓ kgJeep Avenger −265 kg
    Jaecoo 5 EV
    1785
    Jeep Avenger
    1520
  • Boot lJaecoo 5 EV +125 l
    Jaecoo 5 EV
    480
    Jeep Avenger
    355

Add a third car

Technical data: Jaecoo 5 EV vs Jeep Avenger

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Jaecoo 5 EV vs Jeep Avenger
Key parameters Jaecoo 5 EV
Electric
Jeep Avenger
Electric
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range402 km400 kmJaecoo +2 km
Battery61 kWh51 kWhJaecoo +10 kWh
Consumption ↓13.9 kWh/100 km15.5 kWh/100 kmJaecoo −1.6 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging130 kW100 kWJaecoo +30 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80% ↓34 min30 minJeep −4 min
Range per minute of charging8.3 km/min9.3 km/minJeep +1 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power211 PS156 PSJaecoo +55 PS
0–100 km/h ↓7.7 s9 sJaecoo −1.3 s
Top speed175 km/h150 km/hJaecoo +25 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓1785 kg1520 kgJeep −265 kg
Boot480 l355 lJaecoo +125 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly Jaecoo
Length4380 mm4084 mmJaecoo +296 mm
Width1860 mm1776 mmJaecoo +84 mm
Height1650 mm1527 mmJaecoo +123 mm
Wheelbase2620 mm2562 mmJaecoo +58 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Jaecoo 5 EV

Cost per 100 km4.17
Monthly52
Yearly626

Jeep Avenger

Cost per 100 km4.65
Monthly58
Yearly697

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Jaecoo 5 EV

Jeep Avenger

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Jaecoo 5 EV — its 61 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Jeep Avenger, with 51 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — Jaecoo 5 EV or Jeep Avenger?

The Jaecoo 5 EV is stronger: 211 PS against the 156 PS of the Jeep Avenger. The gap is 55 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Jaecoo 5 EV takes more: 480 l against 355 l in the Jeep Avenger. The difference is 125 l.

Which charges faster?

The Jaecoo 5 EV accepts up to 130 kW DC, the Jeep Avenger up to 100 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 34 and 30 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.