Opel Mokka Electric vs Volvo EX30
Biggest differences: DC charging — Opel Mokka Electric 100 kW, Volvo EX30 175 kW · Power — Opel Mokka Electric 156 PS, Volvo EX30 272 PS · 0–100 km/h — Opel Mokka Electric 9 s, Volvo EX30 5.3 s.
Opel Mokka Electric
The Opel Mokka Electric is an all-electric subcompact crossover offering two different powertrain options with varying power outputs and ranges.
Volvo EX30
The Volvo EX30 is an all-electric SUV in the B segment, offering a wide range of powertrain configurations with varying ranges and performance levels.
Profile against the market: Opel Mokka Electric vs Volvo EX30
Opel Mokka Electric54 kWh
Volvo EX30P5 Long Range
Opel Mokka Electric or Volvo EX30 — who wins where
Volvo EX30 leads 7 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmVolvo EX30 +72 km
- Battery kWhVolvo EX30 +15 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmOpel Mokka Electric −1.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolvo EX30 +116 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolvo EX30 −3.7 s
- Top speed km/hVolvo EX30 +30 km/h
- DC charging kWVolvo EX30 +75 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgOpel Mokka Electric −160 kg
- Boot lVolvo EX30 +8 l
Technical data: Opel Mokka Electric vs Volvo EX30
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Opel Mokka Electric 54 kWh | Volvo EX30 P5 Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 403 km | 475 km | Volvo +72 km |
| Battery | 54 kWh | 69 kWh | Volvo +15 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.6 kWh/100 km | 17 kWh/100 km | Opel −1.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 175 kW | Volvo +75 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 27 min 20–80% | 27 min 10–80% | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 9 km/min | 12.3 km/min | Volvo +3.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 156 PS | 272 PS | Volvo +116 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 9 s | 5.3 s | Volvo −3.7 s |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 180 km/h | Volvo +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1615 kg | 1775 kg | Opel −160 kg |
| Boot | 310 l | 318 l | Volvo +8 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Opel |
| Length | 4150 mm | 4233 mm | Volvo +83 mm |
| Width | 1787 mm | 1837 mm | Volvo +50 mm |
| Height | 1535 mm | 1549 mm | Volvo +14 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2557 mm | 2650 mm | Volvo +93 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Opel Mokka Electric
Volvo EX30
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Opel Mokka Electric
Volvo EX30
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Opel Mokka Electric or Volvo EX30?
The Volvo EX30 goes further: 475 km WLTP against the 403 km of the Opel Mokka Electric. That is a difference of 72 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Opel Mokka Electric and the Volvo EX30 differ?
The Opel Mokka Electric has FWD and 156 PS. The Volvo EX30 has RWD and 272 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Opel Mokka Electric — its 54 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Volvo EX30, with 69 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Opel Mokka Electric or Volvo EX30?
The Volvo EX30 is stronger: 272 PS against the 156 PS of the Opel Mokka Electric. The gap is 116 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.