Citroën ë-C3 Aircross vs Opel Mokka Electric
Biggest differences: Boot — Citroën ë-C3 Aircross 460 l, Opel Mokka Electric 310 l · Power — Citroën ë-C3 Aircross 113 PS, Opel Mokka Electric 156 PS · 0–100 km/h — Citroën ë-C3 Aircross 11 s, Opel Mokka Electric 9 s.
Citroën ë-C3 Aircross
The Citroën ë-C3 Aircross is an electric SUV in the B segment, offering two battery options with different WLTP ranges.
Opel Mokka Electric
The Opel Mokka Electric is an all-electric subcompact crossover offering two different powertrain options with varying power outputs and ranges.
Profile against the market: Citroën ë-C3 Aircross vs Opel Mokka Electric
Citroën ë-C3 Aircross54 kWh Extended Range
Opel Mokka Electric54 kWh
Citroën ë-C3 Aircross or Opel Mokka Electric — who wins where
Opel Mokka Electric leads 5 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmOpel Mokka Electric +2 km
- Battery kWhNo difference
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmOpel Mokka Electric −0.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSOpel Mokka Electric +43 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sOpel Mokka Electric −2 s
- Top speed km/hOpel Mokka Electric +18 km/h
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minCitroën ë-C3 Aircross −1 min
- Weight ↓ kgCitroën ë-C3 Aircross −84 kg
- Boot lCitroën ë-C3 Aircross +150 l
Technical data: Citroën ë-C3 Aircross vs Opel Mokka Electric
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Citroën ë-C3 Aircross 54 kWh Extended Range | Opel Mokka Electric 54 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 401 km | 403 km | Opel +2 km |
| Battery | 54 kWh | 54 kWh | No difference |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.7 kWh/100 km | 15.6 kWh/100 km | Opel −0.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 100 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 20–80% ↓ | 26 min | 27 min | Citroën −1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 9.3 km/min | 9 km/min | Citroën +0.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 113 PS | 156 PS | Opel +43 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 11 s | 9 s | Opel −2 s |
| Top speed | 132 km/h | 150 km/h | Opel +18 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1531 kg | 1615 kg | Citroën −84 kg |
| Boot | 460 l | 310 l | Citroën +150 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4395 mm | 4150 mm | Citroën +245 mm |
| Width | 1795 mm | 1787 mm | Citroën +8 mm |
| Height | 1660 mm | 1535 mm | Citroën +125 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2671 mm | 2557 mm | Citroën +114 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Citroën ë-C3 Aircross
Opel Mokka Electric
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Citroën ë-C3 Aircross
Opel Mokka Electric
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which is more powerful — Citroën ë-C3 Aircross or Opel Mokka Electric?
The Opel Mokka Electric is stronger: 156 PS against the 113 PS of the Citroën ë-C3 Aircross. The gap is 43 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Citroën ë-C3 Aircross takes more: 460 l against 310 l in the Opel Mokka Electric. The difference is 150 l.
Which charges faster?
The Citroën ë-C3 Aircross accepts up to 100 kW DC, the Opel Mokka Electric up to 100 kW. Charging from 20 to 80% takes 26 and 27 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.