Citroën ë-C3 Aircross vs Volvo EX30
Biggest differences: Power — Citroën ë-C3 Aircross 113 PS, Volvo EX30 272 PS · 0–100 km/h — Citroën ë-C3 Aircross 11 s, Volvo EX30 5.3 s · DC charging — Citroën ë-C3 Aircross 100 kW, Volvo EX30 175 kW.
Citroën ë-C3 Aircross
The Citroën ë-C3 Aircross is an electric SUV in the B segment, offering two battery options with different WLTP ranges.
Volvo EX30
The Volvo EX30 is an all-electric SUV in the B segment, offering a wide range of powertrain configurations with varying ranges and performance levels.
Profile against the market: Citroën ë-C3 Aircross vs Volvo EX30
Citroën ë-C3 Aircross54 kWh Extended Range
Volvo EX30P5 Long Range
Citroën ë-C3 Aircross or Volvo EX30 — who wins where
Volvo EX30 leads 6 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmVolvo EX30 +74 km
- Battery kWhVolvo EX30 +15 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmCitroën ë-C3 Aircross −1.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolvo EX30 +159 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolvo EX30 −5.7 s
- Top speed km/hVolvo EX30 +48 km/h
- DC charging kWVolvo EX30 +75 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgCitroën ë-C3 Aircross −244 kg
- Boot lCitroën ë-C3 Aircross +142 l
Technical data: Citroën ë-C3 Aircross vs Volvo EX30
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Citroën ë-C3 Aircross 54 kWh Extended Range | Volvo EX30 P5 Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 401 km | 475 km | Volvo +74 km |
| Battery | 54 kWh | 69 kWh | Volvo +15 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.7 kWh/100 km | 17 kWh/100 km | Citroën −1.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 100 kW | 175 kW | Volvo +75 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 26 min 20–80% | 27 min 10–80% | 1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 9.3 km/min | 12.3 km/min | Volvo +3 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 113 PS | 272 PS | Volvo +159 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 11 s | 5.3 s | Volvo −5.7 s |
| Top speed | 132 km/h | 180 km/h | Volvo +48 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1531 kg | 1775 kg | Citroën −244 kg |
| Boot | 460 l | 318 l | Citroën +142 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Citroën |
| Length | 4395 mm | 4233 mm | Citroën +162 mm |
| Width | 1795 mm | 1837 mm | Volvo +42 mm |
| Height | 1660 mm | 1549 mm | Citroën +111 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2671 mm | 2650 mm | Citroën +21 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Citroën ë-C3 Aircross
Volvo EX30
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Citroën ë-C3 Aircross
Volvo EX30
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Citroën ë-C3 Aircross or Volvo EX30?
The Volvo EX30 goes further: 475 km WLTP against the 401 km of the Citroën ë-C3 Aircross. That is a difference of 74 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Citroën ë-C3 Aircross and the Volvo EX30 differ?
The Citroën ë-C3 Aircross has FWD and 113 PS. The Volvo EX30 has RWD and 272 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Citroën ë-C3 Aircross — its 54 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Volvo EX30, with 69 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Citroën ë-C3 Aircross or Volvo EX30?
The Volvo EX30 is stronger: 272 PS against the 113 PS of the Citroën ë-C3 Aircross. The gap is 159 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.