JAC E30X vs Renault 5 E-Tech
Biggest differences: DC charging — JAC E30X 64 kW, Renault 5 E-Tech 100 kW · Power — JAC E30X 136 PS, Renault 5 E-Tech 150 PS · WLTP range — JAC E30X 374 km, Renault 5 E-Tech 410 km.
JAC E30X
The JAC E30X is an electric hatchback in the B-segment, offering two battery options and corresponding ranges, all with the same powertrain output.
Renault 5 E-Tech
The Renault 5 E-Tech is a city hatchback in the B segment, offered with three different powertrain options, each offering varying power outputs and battery capacities.
Profile against the market: JAC E30X vs Renault 5 E-Tech
- JAC E30XNordic Edition 50
Renault 5 E-TechComfort Range 150
JAC E30X or Renault 5 E-Tech — who wins where
Renault 5 E-Tech leads 6 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmRenault 5 E-Tech +36 km
- Battery kWhRenault 5 E-Tech +0.5 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmRenault 5 E-Tech −0.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSRenault 5 E-Tech +14 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sJAC E30X −0.1 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWRenault 5 E-Tech +36 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgJAC E30X −24 kg
- Boot lRenault 5 E-Tech +16 l
Technical data: JAC E30X vs Renault 5 E-Tech
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | JAC E30X Nordic Edition 50 | Renault 5 E-Tech Comfort Range 150 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 374 km | 410 km | Renault +36 km |
| Battery | 51.5 kWh | 52 kWh | Renault +0.5 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.6 kWh/100 km | 14.9 kWh/100 km | Renault −0.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 64 kW | 100 kW | Renault +36 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 45 min 30–80% | 30 min 15–80% | 15 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 4.2 km/min | 8.9 km/min | Renault +4.7 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 136 PS | 150 PS | Renault +14 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.8 s | 7.9 s | JAC −0.1 s |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 150 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1445 kg | 1469 kg | JAC −24 kg |
| Boot | 310 l | 326 l | Renault +16 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Renault |
| Length | 4025 mm | 3922 mm | JAC +103 mm |
| Width | 1770 mm | 1774 mm | Renault +4 mm |
| Height | 1560 mm | 1498 mm | JAC +62 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2620 mm | 2540 mm | JAC +80 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
JAC E30X
Renault 5 E-Tech
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
JAC E30X
Renault 5 E-Tech
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — JAC E30X or Renault 5 E-Tech?
The Renault 5 E-Tech goes further: 410 km WLTP against the 374 km of the JAC E30X. That is a difference of 36 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Renault 5 E-Tech — its 52 kWh battery then works as a power source. The JAC E30X, with 51.5 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The JAC E30X accepts up to 64 kW DC, the Renault 5 E-Tech up to 100 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Renault 5 E-Tech uses less electricity: 14.9 kWh/100 km against 15.6 kWh/100 km in the JAC E30X. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 105 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.