JAC E30X vs Peugeot e-208
Biggest differences: DC charging — JAC E30X 64 kW, Peugeot e-208 100 kW · Boot — JAC E30X 310 l, Peugeot e-208 265 l · WLTP range — JAC E30X 374 km, Peugeot e-208 433 km.
JAC E30X
The JAC E30X is an electric hatchback in the B-segment, offering two battery options and corresponding ranges, all with the same powertrain output.
Peugeot e-208
The Peugeot e-208 is a city hatchback in the B-segment, offered with three different powertrain options, each offering varying power outputs and battery capacities.
Profile against the market: JAC E30X vs Peugeot e-208
- JAC E30XNordic Edition 50
Peugeot e-208GT 156
JAC E30X or Peugeot e-208 — who wins where
It's a tie: 4 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPeugeot e-208 +59 km
- Battery kWhJAC E30X +0.5 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmPeugeot e-208 −0.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSPeugeot e-208 +20 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sJAC E30X −0.4 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWPeugeot e-208 +36 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgJAC E30X −10 kg
- Boot lJAC E30X +45 l
Technical data: JAC E30X vs Peugeot e-208
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | JAC E30X Nordic Edition 50 | GT 156 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 374 km | 433 km | Peugeot +59 km |
| Battery | 51.5 kWh | 51 kWh | JAC +0.5 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.6 kWh/100 km | 14.9 kWh/100 km | Peugeot −0.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 64 kW | 100 kW | Peugeot +36 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 45 min 30–80% | 35 min 0–80% | 10 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 4.2 km/min | 9.9 km/min | Peugeot +5.7 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 136 PS | 156 PS | Peugeot +20 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.8 s | 8.2 s | JAC −0.4 s |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 150 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1445 kg | 1455 kg | JAC −10 kg |
| Boot | 310 l | 265 l | JAC +45 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Peugeot |
| Length | 4025 mm | 4055 mm | Peugeot +30 mm |
| Width | 1770 mm | 1745 mm | JAC +25 mm |
| Height | 1560 mm | 1430 mm | JAC +130 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2620 mm | 2540 mm | JAC +80 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
JAC E30X
Peugeot e-208
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
JAC E30X
Peugeot e-208
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — JAC E30X or Peugeot e-208?
The Peugeot e-208 goes further: 433 km WLTP against the 374 km of the JAC E30X. That is a difference of 59 km.
Why does the JAC E30X have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Peugeot e-208?
The JAC E30X carries 51.5 kWh and covers 374 km, while the Peugeot e-208 with its 51 kWh battery does 433 km. Energy use decides it: 15.6 against 14.9 kWh/100 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Peugeot e-208 — its 51 kWh battery then works as a power source. The JAC E30X, with 51.5 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The JAC E30X takes more: 310 l against 265 l in the Peugeot e-208. The difference is 45 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.





