JAC E30X vs Peugeot e-208

Biggest differences: DC charging — JAC E30X 64 kW, Peugeot e-208 100 kW · Boot — JAC E30X 310 l, Peugeot e-208 265 l · WLTP range — JAC E30X 374 km, Peugeot e-208 433 km.

JAC E30X

The JAC E30X is an electric hatchback in the B-segment, offering two battery options and corresponding ranges, all with the same powertrain output.

Peugeot e-208

The Peugeot e-208 is a city hatchback in the B-segment, offered with three different powertrain options, each offering varying power outputs and battery capacities.

Profile against the market: JAC E30X vs Peugeot e-208

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

JAC E30X or Peugeot e-208 — who wins where

It's a tie: 4 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmPeugeot e-208 +59 km
    JAC E30X
    374
    Peugeot e-208
    433
  • Battery kWhJAC E30X +0.5 kWh
    JAC E30X
    51.5
    Peugeot e-208
    51
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmPeugeot e-208 −0.7 kWh/100 km
    JAC E30X
    15.6
    Peugeot e-208
    14.9
  • Power PSPeugeot e-208 +20 PS
    JAC E30X
    136
    Peugeot e-208
    156
  • 0–100 km/h sJAC E30X −0.4 s
    JAC E30X
    7.8
    Peugeot e-208
    8.2
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    JAC E30X
    150
    Peugeot e-208
    150
  • DC charging kWPeugeot e-208 +36 kW
    JAC E30X
    64
    Peugeot e-208
    100
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    JAC E30X
    11
    Peugeot e-208
    11
  • Weight kgJAC E30X −10 kg
    JAC E30X
    1445
    Peugeot e-208
    1455
  • Boot lJAC E30X +45 l
    JAC E30X
    310
    Peugeot e-208
    265

Add a third car

Technical data: JAC E30X vs Peugeot e-208

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: JAC E30X vs Peugeot e-208
Key parameters JAC E30X
Nordic Edition 50
Peugeot e-208
GT 156
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range374 km433 kmPeugeot +59 km
Battery51.5 kWh51 kWhJAC +0.5 kWh
Consumption15.6 kWh/100 km14.9 kWh/100 kmPeugeot −0.7 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging64 kW100 kWPeugeot +36 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 45 min 30–80%35 min 0–80%10 min
Range per minute of charging4.2 km/min9.9 km/minPeugeot +5.7 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power136 PS156 PSPeugeot +20 PS
0–100 km/h7.8 s8.2 sJAC −0.4 s
Top speed150 km/h150 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1445 kg1455 kgJAC −10 kg
Boot310 l265 lJAC +45 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Peugeot
Length4025 mm4055 mmPeugeot +30 mm
Width1770 mm1745 mmJAC +25 mm
Height1560 mm1430 mmJAC +130 mm
Wheelbase2620 mm2540 mmJAC +80 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

JAC E30X

Cost per 100 km4.68
Monthly59
Yearly702

Peugeot e-208

Cost per 100 km4.47
Monthly56
Yearly671

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

JAC E30X

Peugeot e-208

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — JAC E30X or Peugeot e-208?

The Peugeot e-208 goes further: 433 km WLTP against the 374 km of the JAC E30X. That is a difference of 59 km.

Why does the JAC E30X have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Peugeot e-208?

The JAC E30X carries 51.5 kWh and covers 374 km, while the Peugeot e-208 with its 51 kWh battery does 433 km. Energy use decides it: 15.6 against 14.9 kWh/100 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Peugeot e-208 — its 51 kWh battery then works as a power source. The JAC E30X, with 51.5 kWh, does not offer it.

Which has the bigger boot?

The JAC E30X takes more: 310 l against 265 l in the Peugeot e-208. The difference is 45 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.