JAC E30X vs Nissan Micra
Biggest differences: DC charging — JAC E30X 64 kW, Nissan Micra 100 kW · WLTP range — JAC E30X 374 km, Nissan Micra 416 km · Power — JAC E30X 136 PS, Nissan Micra 150 PS.
JAC E30X
The JAC E30X is an electric hatchback in the B-segment, offering two battery options and corresponding ranges, all with the same powertrain output.
Nissan Micra
The Nissan Micra (Model Year 2026) is a compact, segment B hatchback available with two different range and power configurations, offering front-wheel drive.
Profile against the market: JAC E30X vs Nissan Micra
- JAC E30XNordic Edition 50
Nissan Micra52 kWh
JAC E30X or Nissan Micra — who wins where
Nissan Micra leads 6 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmNissan Micra +42 km
- Battery kWhNissan Micra +0.5 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmNissan Micra −0.9 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNissan Micra +14 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sJAC E30X −0.2 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWNissan Micra +36 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgJAC E30X −7 kg
- Boot lNissan Micra +16 l
Technical data: JAC E30X vs Nissan Micra
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | JAC E30X Nordic Edition 50 | Nissan Micra 52 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 374 km | 416 km | Nissan +42 km |
| Battery | 51.5 kWh | 52 kWh | Nissan +0.5 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.6 kWh/100 km | 14.7 kWh/100 km | Nissan −0.9 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 64 kW | 100 kW | Nissan +36 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 45 min 30–80% | 30 min 15–80% | 15 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 4.2 km/min | 9 km/min | Nissan +4.8 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 136 PS | 150 PS | Nissan +14 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.8 s | 8 s | JAC −0.2 s |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 150 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1445 kg | 1452 kg | JAC −7 kg |
| Boot | 310 l | 326 l | Nissan +16 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Nissan |
| Length | 4025 mm | 3974 mm | JAC +51 mm |
| Width | 1770 mm | 1774 mm | Nissan +4 mm |
| Height | 1560 mm | 1499 mm | JAC +61 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2620 mm | 2541 mm | JAC +79 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
JAC E30X
Nissan Micra
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
JAC E30X
Nissan Micra
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — JAC E30X or Nissan Micra?
The Nissan Micra goes further: 416 km WLTP against the 374 km of the JAC E30X. That is a difference of 42 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Nissan Micra — its 52 kWh battery then works as a power source. The JAC E30X, with 51.5 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The JAC E30X accepts up to 64 kW DC, the Nissan Micra up to 100 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Nissan Micra uses less electricity: 14.7 kWh/100 km against 15.6 kWh/100 km in the JAC E30X. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 135 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.