Hyundai Ioniq 5 vs Škoda Enyaq
Škoda Enyaq leads 6 to 5
Biggest differences: Charging 10–80% — Hyundai Ioniq 5 18 min, Škoda Enyaq 29 min · DC charging — Hyundai Ioniq 5 260 kW, Škoda Enyaq 165 kW · Power — Hyundai Ioniq 5 229 PS, Škoda Enyaq 286 PS.
Hyundai Ioniq 5
The Hyundai Ioniq 5 is a crossover vehicle in the D segment, offering three different powertrain options with WLTP ranges reaching up to 570 km.
Škoda Enyaq
The Škoda Enyaq is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, available with RWD or AWD: it offers power outputs from 190 to 340 horsepower, a range of up to 581 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 165 kW.
Profile against the market: Hyundai Ioniq 5 vs Škoda Enyaq
Hyundai Ioniq 584 kWh RWD
Škoda Enyaq85
Hyundai Ioniq 5 or Škoda Enyaq — who wins where
Škoda Enyaq leads 6 to 5
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmŠkoda Enyaq +11 km
- Battery kWhHyundai Ioniq 5 +7 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Enyaq −0.8 kWh/100 km
- Power PSŠkoda Enyaq +57 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Enyaq −0.9 s
- Top speed km/hHyundai Ioniq 5 +5 km/h
- DC charging kWHyundai Ioniq 5 +95 kW
- AC charging kWŠkoda Enyaq +0.5 kW
- Charging ↓ minHyundai Ioniq 5 −11 min
- Weight ↓ kgHyundai Ioniq 5 −81 kg
- Boot lŠkoda Enyaq +65 l
Technical data: Hyundai Ioniq 5 vs Škoda Enyaq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Hyundai Ioniq 5 84 kWh RWD | Škoda Enyaq 85 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 570 km | 581 km | Škoda +11 km |
| Battery | 84 kWh | 77 kWh | Hyundai +7 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 16 kWh/100 km | 15.2 kWh/100 km | Škoda −0.8 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 260 kW | 165 kW | Hyundai +95 kW |
| AC charging | 10.5 kW | 11 kW | Škoda +0.5 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 18 min | 29 min | Hyundai −11 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 22.2 km/min | 14 km/min | Hyundai +8.2 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Hyundai +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 229 PS | 286 PS | Škoda +57 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.5 s | 6.6 s | Škoda −0.9 s |
| Top speed | 185 km/h | 180 km/h | Hyundai +5 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1985 kg | 2066 kg | Hyundai −81 kg |
| Boot | 520 l | 585 l | Škoda +65 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4655 mm | 4658 mm | Škoda +3 mm |
| Width | 1890 mm | 1879 mm | Hyundai +11 mm |
| Height | 1605 mm | 1622 mm | Škoda +17 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3000 mm | 2766 mm | Hyundai +234 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Hyundai Ioniq 5
Škoda Enyaq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Hyundai Ioniq 5
Škoda Enyaq
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Why does the Hyundai Ioniq 5 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Škoda Enyaq?
The Hyundai Ioniq 5 carries 84 kWh and covers 570 km, while the Škoda Enyaq with its 77 kWh battery does 581 km. Energy use decides it: 16 against 15.2 kWh/100 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Škoda Enyaq takes more: 585 l against 520 l in the Hyundai Ioniq 5. The difference is 65 l.
Which charges faster?
The Hyundai Ioniq 5 accepts up to 260 kW DC, the Škoda Enyaq up to 165 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 18 and 29 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Škoda Enyaq uses less electricity: 15.2 kWh/100 km against 16 kWh/100 km in the Hyundai Ioniq 5. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 120 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.