Hyundai Ioniq 5 vs Toyota bZ4X
Biggest differences: DC charging — Hyundai Ioniq 5 260 kW, Toyota bZ4X 150 kW · Charging 10–80% — Hyundai Ioniq 5 18 min, Toyota bZ4X 28 min · Battery — Hyundai Ioniq 5 84 kWh, Toyota bZ4X 69 kWh.
Hyundai Ioniq 5
The Hyundai Ioniq 5 is a crossover vehicle in the D segment, offering three different powertrain options with WLTP ranges reaching up to 570 km.
Toyota bZ4X
The Toyota bZ4X is a compact SUV (segment D) that offers both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive options, as well as battery packs with varying capacities.
Profile against the market: Hyundai Ioniq 5 vs Toyota bZ4X
Hyundai Ioniq 584 kWh RWD
Toyota bZ4XFWD 73.1 kWh
Hyundai Ioniq 5 or Toyota bZ4X — who wins where
Hyundai Ioniq 5 leads 7 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmHyundai Ioniq 5 +1 km
- Battery kWhHyundai Ioniq 5 +15 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmToyota bZ4X −2.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSHyundai Ioniq 5 +5 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sToyota bZ4X −0.1 s
- Top speed km/hHyundai Ioniq 5 +25 km/h
- DC charging kWHyundai Ioniq 5 +110 kW
- AC charging kWToyota bZ4X +0.5 kW
- Charging ↓ minHyundai Ioniq 5 −10 min
- Weight ↓ kgToyota bZ4X −55 kg
- Boot lHyundai Ioniq 5 +68 l
Technical data: Hyundai Ioniq 5 vs Toyota bZ4X
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Hyundai Ioniq 5 84 kWh RWD | Toyota bZ4X FWD 73.1 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 570 km | 569 km | Hyundai +1 km |
| Battery | 84 kWh | 69 kWh | Hyundai +15 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 16 kWh/100 km | 13.9 kWh/100 km | Toyota −2.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 260 kW | 150 kW | Hyundai +110 kW |
| AC charging | 10.5 kW | 11 kW | Toyota +0.5 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 18 min | 28 min | Hyundai −10 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 22.2 km/min | 14.2 km/min | Hyundai +8 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Hyundai +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 229 PS | 224 PS | Hyundai +5 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.5 s | 7.4 s | Toyota −0.1 s |
| Top speed | 185 km/h | 160 km/h | Hyundai +25 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1985 kg | 1930 kg | Toyota −55 kg |
| Boot | 520 l | 452 l | Hyundai +68 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4655 mm | 4690 mm | Toyota +35 mm |
| Width | 1890 mm | 1860 mm | Hyundai +30 mm |
| Height | 1605 mm | 1650 mm | Toyota +45 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3000 mm | 2850 mm | Hyundai +150 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Hyundai Ioniq 5
Toyota bZ4X
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Hyundai Ioniq 5
Toyota bZ4X
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
How do the drivetrains of the Hyundai Ioniq 5 and the Toyota bZ4X differ?
The Hyundai Ioniq 5 has RWD and 229 PS. The Toyota bZ4X has FWD and 224 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Hyundai Ioniq 5 takes more: 520 l against 452 l in the Toyota bZ4X. The difference is 68 l.
Which charges faster?
The Hyundai Ioniq 5 accepts up to 260 kW DC, the Toyota bZ4X up to 150 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 18 and 28 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Toyota bZ4X uses less electricity: 13.9 kWh/100 km against 16 kWh/100 km in the Hyundai Ioniq 5. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 315 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.