Genesis GV60 vs Genesis GV70 Electrified
It's a tie: 4 to 4
Biggest differences: Power — Genesis GV60 229 PS, Genesis GV70 Electrified 490 PS · 0–100 km/h — Genesis GV60 7.8 s, Genesis GV70 Electrified 5 s · Top speed — Genesis GV60 185 km/h, Genesis GV70 Electrified 235 km/h.
Genesis GV60
The Genesis GV60 is a crossover (segment D) offering either rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive, with power ranging from 229 to 490 horsepower.
Genesis GV70 Electrified
The Genesis GV70 Electrified is a D-segment SUV: in model year 2026 it has an 84 kWh battery, a WLTP range of 479 km and 490 hp with AWD.
Profile against the market: Genesis GV60 vs Genesis GV70 Electrified
Genesis GV60Premium RWD
Genesis GV70 ElectrifiedAWD 84 kWh
Genesis GV60 or Genesis GV70 Electrified — who wins where
It's a tie: 4 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmGenesis GV60 +82 km
- Battery kWhNo difference
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmGenesis GV60 −2.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSGenesis GV70 Electrified +261 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sGenesis GV70 Electrified −2.8 s
- Top speed km/hGenesis GV70 Electrified +50 km/h
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minGenesis GV60 −1 min
- Weight ↓ kgGenesis GV60 −285 kg
- Boot lGenesis GV70 Electrified +71 l
Technical data: Genesis GV60 vs Genesis GV70 Electrified
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Genesis GV60Premium RWD | Genesis GV70 ElectrifiedAWD 84 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 561 km | 479 km | Genesis +82 km |
| Battery | 84 kWh | 84 kWh | No difference |
| Consumption ↓ | 16.7 kWh/100 km | 19.4 kWh/100 km | Genesis −2.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 240 kW | 240 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 18 min | 19 min | Genesis −1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 21.8 km/min | 17.6 km/min | Genesis +4.2 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 229 PS | 490 PS | Genesis +261 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.8 s | 5 s | Genesis −2.8 s |
| Top speed | 185 km/h | 235 km/h | Genesis +50 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2050 kg | 2335 kg | Genesis −285 kg |
| Boot | 432 l | 503 l | Genesis +71 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4515 mm | 4715 mm | Genesis +200 mm |
| Width | 1890 mm | — | — |
| Height | 1580 mm | 1630 mm | Genesis +50 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2900 mm | 2875 mm | Genesis +25 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Genesis GV60
Genesis GV70 Electrified
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Genesis GV60
Genesis GV70 Electrified
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Genesis GV60 or Genesis GV70 Electrified?
The Genesis GV60 goes further: 561 km WLTP against the 479 km of the Genesis GV70 Electrified. That is a difference of 82 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Genesis GV60 and the Genesis GV70 Electrified differ?
The Genesis GV60 has RWD and 229 PS. The Genesis GV70 Electrified has AWD and 490 PS.
Which is more powerful — Genesis GV60 or Genesis GV70 Electrified?
The Genesis GV70 Electrified is stronger: 490 PS against the 229 PS of the Genesis GV60. The gap is 261 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Genesis GV70 Electrified takes more: 503 l against 432 l in the Genesis GV60. The difference is 71 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.





