Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Genesis GV60
Ford Mustang Mach-E leads 5 to 3
Biggest differences: DC charging — Ford Mustang Mach-E 150 kW, Genesis GV60 240 kW · 0–100 km/h — Ford Mustang Mach-E 6.1 s, Genesis GV60 7.8 s · Power — Ford Mustang Mach-E 276 PS, Genesis GV60 229 PS.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Ford Mustang Mach-E is a D-segment SUV, in model year 2026 in four variants: WLTP range from 470 to 615 km, power from 268 to 487 hp.
Genesis GV60
The Genesis GV60 is a crossover (segment D) offering either rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive, with power ranging from 229 to 490 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Genesis GV60
Ford Mustang Mach-EExtended Range RWD · 2026 model year
Genesis GV60Premium RWD
Ford Mustang Mach-E or Genesis GV60 — who wins where
Ford Mustang Mach-E leads 5 to 3
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmFord Mustang Mach-E +54 km
- Battery kWhFord Mustang Mach-E +4 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmFord Mustang Mach-E −2.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSFord Mustang Mach-E +47 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sFord Mustang Mach-E −1.7 s
- Top speed km/hGenesis GV60 +5 km/h
- DC charging kWGenesis GV60 +90 kW
- AC charging kWNo data
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgGenesis GV60 −36 kg
- Boot lNo data
Technical data: Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Genesis GV60
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range RWD · 2026 model year | Genesis GV60 Premium RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 615 km | 561 km | Ford +54 km |
| Battery | 88 kWh | 84 kWh | Ford +4 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.3 kWh/100 km | 16.7 kWh/100 km | Ford −2.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 150 kW | 240 kW | Genesis +90 kW |
| AC charging | — | 11 kW | — |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | — | 18 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 21.8 km/min | — |
| Voltage | — | 800 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 276 PS | 229 PS | Ford +47 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.1 s | 7.8 s | Ford −1.7 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 185 km/h | Genesis +5 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2086 kg | 2050 kg | Genesis −36 kg |
| Boot | — | 432 l | — |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Genesis |
| Length | — | 4515 mm | — |
| Width | — | 1890 mm | — |
| Height | — | 1580 mm | — |
| Wheelbase | — | 2900 mm | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Genesis GV60
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Genesis GV60
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Ford Mustang Mach-E or Genesis GV60?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E goes further: 615 km WLTP against the 561 km of the Genesis GV60. That is a difference of 54 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Genesis GV60 — its 84 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Ford Mustang Mach-E, with 88 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E accepts up to 150 kW DC, the Genesis GV60 up to 240 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E uses less electricity: 14.3 kWh/100 km against 16.7 kWh/100 km in the Genesis GV60. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 360 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.