Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Lexus RZ
Ford Mustang Mach-E leads 6 to 1
Biggest differences: Power — Ford Mustang Mach-E 276 PS, Lexus RZ 224 PS · 0–100 km/h — Ford Mustang Mach-E 6.1 s, Lexus RZ 7.5 s · Battery — Ford Mustang Mach-E 88 kWh, Lexus RZ 72 kWh.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Ford Mustang Mach-E is a D-segment SUV, in model year 2026 in four variants: WLTP range from 470 to 615 km, power from 268 to 487 hp.
Lexus RZ
The Lexus RZ is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, offering three power and drivetrain options with a WLTP range of up to 568 kilometers.
Profile against the market: Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Lexus RZ
Ford Mustang Mach-EExtended Range RWD · 2026 model year
Lexus RZ350e
Ford Mustang Mach-E or Lexus RZ — who wins where
Ford Mustang Mach-E leads 6 to 1
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmFord Mustang Mach-E +47 km
- Battery kWhFord Mustang Mach-E +16 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmFord Mustang Mach-E −0.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSFord Mustang Mach-E +52 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sFord Mustang Mach-E −1.4 s
- Top speed km/hFord Mustang Mach-E +20 km/h
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo data
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgLexus RZ −91 kg
- Boot lNo data
Technical data: Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Lexus RZ
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range RWD · 2026 model year | Lexus RZ 350e | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 615 km | 568 km | Ford +47 km |
| Battery | 88 kWh | 72 kWh | Ford +16 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.3 kWh/100 km | 14.7 kWh/100 km | Ford −0.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 150 kW | 150 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | — | 22 kW | — |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | — | 30 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 13.3 km/min | — |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 276 PS | 224 PS | Ford +52 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.1 s | 7.5 s | Ford −1.4 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 160 km/h | Ford +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2086 kg | 1995 kg | Lexus −91 kg |
| Boot | — | 522 l | — |
| Length | — | 4805 mm | — |
| Width | — | 1895 mm | — |
| Height | — | 1635 mm | — |
| Wheelbase | — | 2850 mm | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Lexus RZ
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Ford Mustang Mach-E or Lexus RZ?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E goes further: 615 km WLTP against the 568 km of the Lexus RZ. That is a difference of 47 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Ford Mustang Mach-E and the Lexus RZ differ?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E has RWD and 276 PS. The Lexus RZ has FWD and 224 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E accepts up to 150 kW DC, the Lexus RZ up to 150 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E uses less electricity: 14.3 kWh/100 km against 14.7 kWh/100 km in the Lexus RZ. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 60 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.