Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Toyota bZ4X
Ford Mustang Mach-E leads 5 to 2
Biggest differences: Battery — Ford Mustang Mach-E 88 kWh, Toyota bZ4X 69 kWh · Power — Ford Mustang Mach-E 276 PS, Toyota bZ4X 224 PS · 0–100 km/h — Ford Mustang Mach-E 6.1 s, Toyota bZ4X 7.4 s.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Ford Mustang Mach-E is a D-segment SUV, in model year 2026 in four variants: WLTP range from 470 to 615 km, power from 268 to 487 hp.
Toyota bZ4X
The Toyota bZ4X is a compact SUV (segment D) that offers both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive options, as well as battery packs with varying capacities.
Profile against the market: Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Toyota bZ4X
Ford Mustang Mach-EExtended Range RWD · 2026 model year
Toyota bZ4XFWD 73.1 kWh
Ford Mustang Mach-E or Toyota bZ4X — who wins where
Ford Mustang Mach-E leads 5 to 2
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmFord Mustang Mach-E +46 km
- Battery kWhFord Mustang Mach-E +19 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmToyota bZ4X −0.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSFord Mustang Mach-E +52 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sFord Mustang Mach-E −1.3 s
- Top speed km/hFord Mustang Mach-E +20 km/h
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo data
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgToyota bZ4X −156 kg
- Boot lNo data
Technical data: Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Toyota bZ4X
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range RWD · 2026 model year | Toyota bZ4X FWD 73.1 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 615 km | 569 km | Ford +46 km |
| Battery | 88 kWh | 69 kWh | Ford +19 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.3 kWh/100 km | 13.9 kWh/100 km | Toyota −0.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 150 kW | 150 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | — | 11 kW | — |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | — | 28 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 14.2 km/min | — |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 276 PS | 224 PS | Ford +52 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.1 s | 7.4 s | Ford −1.3 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 160 km/h | Ford +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2086 kg | 1930 kg | Toyota −156 kg |
| Boot | — | 452 l | — |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Toyota |
| Length | — | 4690 mm | — |
| Width | — | 1860 mm | — |
| Height | — | 1650 mm | — |
| Wheelbase | — | 2850 mm | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Toyota bZ4X
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Toyota bZ4X
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Ford Mustang Mach-E or Toyota bZ4X?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E goes further: 615 km WLTP against the 569 km of the Toyota bZ4X. That is a difference of 46 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Ford Mustang Mach-E and the Toyota bZ4X differ?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E has RWD and 276 PS. The Toyota bZ4X has FWD and 224 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Toyota bZ4X — its 69 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Ford Mustang Mach-E, with 88 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E accepts up to 150 kW DC, the Toyota bZ4X up to 150 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.