BMW iX4 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E
BMW iX4 leads 6 to 2
Biggest differences: DC charging — BMW iX4 400 kW, Ford Mustang Mach-E 150 kW · Power — BMW iX4 469 PS, Ford Mustang Mach-E 276 PS · WLTP range — BMW iX4 828 km, Ford Mustang Mach-E 615 km.
BMW iX4
The BMW iX4 is an all-electric SUV in the D segment with all-wheel drive (AWD): it offers power outputs ranging from 374 to 469 horsepower, a range of up to 828 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 400 kW.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Ford Mustang Mach-E is a D-segment SUV, in model year 2026 in four variants: WLTP range from 470 to 615 km, power from 268 to 487 hp.
Profile against the market: BMW iX4 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E
BMW iX450 xDrive
Ford Mustang Mach-EExtended Range RWD · 2026 model year
BMW iX4 or Ford Mustang Mach-E — who wins where
BMW iX4 leads 6 to 2
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmBMW iX4 +213 km
- Battery kWhBMW iX4 +20.7 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmFord Mustang Mach-E −1.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSBMW iX4 +193 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sBMW iX4 −1.2 s
- Top speed km/hBMW iX4 +30 km/h
- DC charging kWBMW iX4 +250 kW
- AC charging kWNo data
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgFord Mustang Mach-E −219 kg
- Boot lNo data
Technical data: BMW iX4 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BMW iX4 50 xDrive | Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range RWD · 2026 model year | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 828 km | 615 km | BMW +213 km |
| Battery | 108.7 kWh | 88 kWh | BMW +20.7 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.7 kWh/100 km | 14.3 kWh/100 km | Ford −1.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 400 kW | 150 kW | BMW +250 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | — | — |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 21 min | — | — |
| Range per minute of charging | 27.6 km/min | — | — |
| Voltage | 800 V | — | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 469 PS | 276 PS | BMW +193 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.9 s | 6.1 s | BMW −1.2 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 180 km/h | BMW +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2305 kg | 2086 kg | Ford −219 kg |
| Boot | 490 l | — | — |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only BMW |
| Length | 4782 mm | — | — |
| Width | 1895 mm | — | — |
| Height | 1595 mm | — | — |
| Wheelbase | 2897 mm | — | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BMW iX4
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — BMW iX4 or Ford Mustang Mach-E?
The BMW iX4 goes further: 828 km WLTP against the 615 km of the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That is a difference of 213 km.
How do the drivetrains of the BMW iX4 and the Ford Mustang Mach-E differ?
The BMW iX4 has AWD and 469 PS. The Ford Mustang Mach-E has RWD and 276 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the BMW iX4 — its 108.7 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Ford Mustang Mach-E, with 88 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — BMW iX4 or Ford Mustang Mach-E?
The BMW iX4 is stronger: 469 PS against the 276 PS of the Ford Mustang Mach-E. The gap is 193 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.