Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Tesla Model Y
Biggest differences: Boot — Ford Mustang Mach-E 402 l, Tesla Model Y 822 l · Power — Ford Mustang Mach-E 294 PS, Tesla Model Y 514 PS · DC charging — Ford Mustang Mach-E 150 kW, Tesla Model Y 250 kW.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
The Ford Mustang Mach-E is a D-segment SUV offering four different powertrain and battery configurations with WLTP ranges from 470 to 600 km.
Tesla Model Y
The Tesla Model Y is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering three different drive configurations with varying ranges and acceleration performance.
Profile against the market: Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Tesla Model Y
Ford Mustang Mach-EExtended Range RWD
Tesla Model YPremium AWD
Ford Mustang Mach-E or Tesla Model Y — who wins where
Tesla Model Y leads 8 to 1
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmTesla Model Y +22 km
- Battery kWhFord Mustang Mach-E +12 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmTesla Model Y −1.9 kWh/100 km
- Power PSTesla Model Y +220 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sTesla Model Y −1.4 s
- Top speed km/hTesla Model Y +21 km/h
- DC charging kWTesla Model Y +100 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgTesla Model Y −132 kg
- Boot lTesla Model Y +420 l
Technical data: Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Tesla Model Y
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range RWD | Tesla Model Y Premium AWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 600 km | 622 km | Tesla +22 km |
| Battery | 91 kWh | 79 kWh | Ford +12 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.5 kWh/100 km | 15.6 kWh/100 km | Tesla −1.9 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 150 kW | 250 kW | Tesla +100 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 36 min | — | — |
| Range per minute of charging | 11.7 km/min | — | — |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 294 PS | 514 PS | Tesla +220 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.2 s | 4.8 s | Tesla −1.4 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 201 km/h | Tesla +21 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2129 kg | 1997 kg | Tesla −132 kg |
| Boot | 402 l | 822 l | Tesla +420 l |
| Length | 4713 mm | 4790 mm | Tesla +77 mm |
| Width | 1881 mm | 1920 mm | Tesla +39 mm |
| Height | 1597 mm | 1624 mm | Tesla +27 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2984 mm | 2890 mm | Ford +94 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Tesla Model Y
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Tesla Model Y
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Ford Mustang Mach-E or Tesla Model Y?
The Tesla Model Y goes further: 622 km WLTP against the 600 km of the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That is a difference of 22 km.
Why does the Ford Mustang Mach-E have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Tesla Model Y?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E carries 91 kWh and covers 600 km, while the Tesla Model Y with its 79 kWh battery does 622 km. Energy use decides it: 17.5 against 15.6 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Ford Mustang Mach-E and the Tesla Model Y differ?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E has RWD and 294 PS. The Tesla Model Y has AWD and 514 PS.
Which is more powerful — Ford Mustang Mach-E or Tesla Model Y?
The Tesla Model Y is stronger: 514 PS against the 294 PS of the Ford Mustang Mach-E. The gap is 220 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.