Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Tesla Model Y
Tesla Model Y leads 6 to 2
Biggest differences: Power — Ford Mustang Mach-E 276 PS, Tesla Model Y 514 PS · DC charging — Ford Mustang Mach-E 150 kW, Tesla Model Y 250 kW · 0–100 km/h — Ford Mustang Mach-E 6.1 s, Tesla Model Y 4.6 s.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Ford Mustang Mach-E is a D-segment SUV, in model year 2026 in four variants: WLTP range from 470 to 615 km, power from 268 to 487 hp.
Tesla Model Y
The Tesla Model Y is a segment D SUV offered in four variants in the 2026 model year: WLTP range from 525 to 622 km, 0-100 km/h acceleration from 7.2 to 3.5 seconds.
Profile against the market: Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Tesla Model Y
Ford Mustang Mach-EExtended Range RWD · 2026 model year
Tesla Model YPremium AWD
Ford Mustang Mach-E or Tesla Model Y — who wins where
Tesla Model Y leads 6 to 2
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmTesla Model Y +7 km
- Battery kWhFord Mustang Mach-E +9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmFord Mustang Mach-E −1.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSTesla Model Y +238 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sTesla Model Y −1.5 s
- Top speed km/hTesla Model Y +21 km/h
- DC charging kWTesla Model Y +100 kW
- AC charging kWNo data
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgTesla Model Y −89 kg
- Boot lNo data
Technical data: Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Tesla Model Y
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range RWD · 2026 model year | Tesla Model Y Premium AWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 615 km | 622 km | Tesla +7 km |
| Battery | 88 kWh | 79 kWh | Ford +9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.3 kWh/100 km | 15.6 kWh/100 km | Ford −1.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 150 kW | 250 kW | Tesla +100 kW |
| AC charging | — | 11 kW | — |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | — | — | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | — | — |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 276 PS | 514 PS | Tesla +238 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.1 s | 4.6 s | Tesla −1.5 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 201 km/h | Tesla +21 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2086 kg | 1997 kg | Tesla −89 kg |
| Boot | — | 822 l | — |
| Length | — | 4790 mm | — |
| Width | — | 1920 mm | — |
| Height | — | 1624 mm | — |
| Wheelbase | — | 2890 mm | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Tesla Model Y
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Tesla Model Y
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Why does the Ford Mustang Mach-E have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Tesla Model Y?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E carries 88 kWh and covers 615 km, while the Tesla Model Y with its 79 kWh battery does 622 km. Energy use decides it: 14.3 against 15.6 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Ford Mustang Mach-E and the Tesla Model Y differ?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E has RWD and 276 PS. The Tesla Model Y has AWD and 514 PS.
Which is more powerful — Ford Mustang Mach-E or Tesla Model Y?
The Tesla Model Y is stronger: 514 PS against the 276 PS of the Ford Mustang Mach-E. The gap is 238 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E accepts up to 150 kW DC, the Tesla Model Y up to 250 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.