GAC Aion UT vs Peugeot e-308
Biggest differences: Power — GAC Aion UT 204 PS, Peugeot e-308 156 PS · 0–100 km/h — GAC Aion UT 7.3 s, Peugeot e-308 9.3 s · Boot — GAC Aion UT 440 l, Peugeot e-308 361 l.
GAC Aion UT
The GAC Aion UT is an electric hatchback in the C-segment, offering a range of 430 km according to the WLTP cycle and accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in 7.3 seconds.
Peugeot e-308
The Peugeot e-308 is an electric hatchback in the C-segment, offering a range of up to 450 km in the WLTP cycle and front-wheel drive (FWD).
Profile against the market: GAC Aion UT vs Peugeot e-308
GAC Aion UT60 kWh
Peugeot e-308156
GAC Aion UT or Peugeot e-308 — who wins where
GAC Aion UT leads 5 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPeugeot e-308 +20 km
- Battery kWhGAC Aion UT +4.6 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmPeugeot e-308 −1.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSGAC Aion UT +48 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sGAC Aion UT −2 s
- Top speed km/hPeugeot e-308 +10 km/h
- DC charging kWPeugeot e-308 +13 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgGAC Aion UT −29 kg
- Boot lGAC Aion UT +79 l
Technical data: GAC Aion UT vs Peugeot e-308
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | GAC Aion UT 60 kWh | Peugeot e-308 156 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 430 km | 450 km | Peugeot +20 km |
| Battery | 60 kWh | 55.4 kWh | GAC +4.6 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 16.4 kWh/100 km | 14.9 kWh/100 km | Peugeot −1.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 87 kW | 100 kW | Peugeot +13 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 32 min 10–80% | 32 min 20–80% | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 9.4 km/min | 8.4 km/min | GAC +1 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 204 PS | 156 PS | GAC +48 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.3 s | 9.3 s | GAC −2 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 170 km/h | Peugeot +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1645 kg | 1674 kg | GAC −29 kg |
| Boot | 440 l | 361 l | GAC +79 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4270 mm | 4367 mm | Peugeot +97 mm |
| Width | 1850 mm | 1852 mm | Peugeot +2 mm |
| Height | 1575 mm | 1441 mm | GAC +134 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2750 mm | 2675 mm | GAC +75 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
GAC Aion UT
Peugeot e-308
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
GAC Aion UT
Peugeot e-308
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — GAC Aion UT or Peugeot e-308?
The Peugeot e-308 goes further: 450 km WLTP against the 430 km of the GAC Aion UT. That is a difference of 20 km.
Why does the GAC Aion UT have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Peugeot e-308?
The GAC Aion UT carries 60 kWh and covers 430 km, while the Peugeot e-308 with its 55.4 kWh battery does 450 km. Energy use decides it: 16.4 against 14.9 kWh/100 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The GAC Aion UT takes more: 440 l against 361 l in the Peugeot e-308. The difference is 79 l.
Which charges faster?
The GAC Aion UT accepts up to 87 kW DC, the Peugeot e-308 up to 100 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.