Citroën ë-C4 vs GAC Aion UT

Biggest differences: Power — Citroën ë-C4 156 PS, GAC Aion UT 204 PS · 0–100 km/h — Citroën ë-C4 9.1 s, GAC Aion UT 7.3 s · Battery — Citroën ë-C4 51 kWh, GAC Aion UT 60 kWh.

Citroën ë-C4

The Citroën ë-C4 is a compact electric hatchback that offers two different power and range options.

GAC Aion UT

The GAC Aion UT is an electric hatchback in the C-segment, offering a range of 430 km according to the WLTP cycle and accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in 7.3 seconds.

Profile against the market: Citroën ë-C4 vs GAC Aion UT

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Citroën ë-C4 or GAC Aion UT — who wins where

GAC Aion UT leads 6 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmGAC Aion UT +14 km
    Citroën ë-C4
    416
    GAC Aion UT
    430
  • Battery kWhGAC Aion UT +9 kWh
    Citroën ë-C4
    51
    GAC Aion UT
    60
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmCitroën ë-C4 −1.5 kWh/100 km
    Citroën ë-C4
    14.9
    GAC Aion UT
    16.4
  • Power PSGAC Aion UT +48 PS
    Citroën ë-C4
    156
    GAC Aion UT
    204
  • 0–100 km/h sGAC Aion UT −1.8 s
    Citroën ë-C4
    9.1
    GAC Aion UT
    7.3
  • Top speed km/hGAC Aion UT +10 km/h
    Citroën ë-C4
    150
    GAC Aion UT
    160
  • DC charging kWCitroën ë-C4 +13 kW
    Citroën ë-C4
    100
    GAC Aion UT
    87
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Citroën ë-C4
    11
    GAC Aion UT
    11
  • Weight kgCitroën ë-C4 −74 kg
    Citroën ë-C4
    1571
    GAC Aion UT
    1645
  • Boot lGAC Aion UT +60 l
    Citroën ë-C4
    380
    GAC Aion UT
    440

Add a third car

Technical data: Citroën ë-C4 vs GAC Aion UT

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Citroën ë-C4 vs GAC Aion UT
Key parameters Citroën ë-C4
Electric 156
GAC Aion UT
60 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range416 km430 kmGAC +14 km
Battery51 kWh60 kWhGAC +9 kWh
Consumption14.9 kWh/100 km16.4 kWh/100 kmCitroën −1.5 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW87 kWCitroën +13 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 35 min 20–80%32 min 10–80%3 min
Range per minute of charging7.1 km/min9.4 km/minGAC +2.3 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power156 PS204 PSGAC +48 PS
0–100 km/h9.1 s7.3 sGAC −1.8 s
Top speed150 km/h160 km/hGAC +10 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1571 kg1645 kgCitroën −74 kg
Boot380 l440 lGAC +60 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4360 mm4270 mmCitroën +90 mm
Width1800 mm1850 mmGAC +50 mm
Height1525 mm1575 mmGAC +50 mm
Wheelbase2670 mm2750 mmGAC +80 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Citroën ë-C4

Cost per 100 km4.47
Monthly56
Yearly671

GAC Aion UT

Cost per 100 km4.92
Monthly61
Yearly738

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Citroën ë-C4

GAC Aion UT

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Citroën ë-C4 or GAC Aion UT?

The GAC Aion UT goes further: 430 km WLTP against the 416 km of the Citroën ë-C4. That is a difference of 14 km.

Which has the bigger boot?

The GAC Aion UT takes more: 440 l against 380 l in the Citroën ë-C4. The difference is 60 l.

Which charges faster?

The Citroën ë-C4 accepts up to 100 kW DC, the GAC Aion UT up to 87 kW.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Citroën ë-C4 uses less electricity: 14.9 kWh/100 km against 16.4 kWh/100 km in the GAC Aion UT. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 225 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.