Audi A2 e-tron vs Citroën ë-C4

Audi A2 e-tron leads 8 to 1

Biggest differences: DC charging — Audi A2 e-tron 183 kW, Citroën ë-C4 100 kW · WLTP range — Audi A2 e-tron 646 km, Citroën ë-C4 416 km · Battery — Audi A2 e-tron 79 kWh, Citroën ë-C4 51 kWh.

Audi A2 e-tron

The Audi A2 e-tron is an electric hatchback in the C segment, offered with four different powertrain configurations and a WLTP range of up to 646 km.

Citroën ë-C4

The Citroën ë-C4 is a compact electric hatchback that offers two different power and range options.

Profile against the market: Audi A2 e-tron vs Citroën ë-C4

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Audi A2 e-tron or Citroën ë-C4 — who wins where

Audi A2 e-tron leads 8 to 1

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmAudi A2 e-tron +230 km
    Audi A2 e-tron
    646
    Citroën ë-C4
    416
  • Battery kWhAudi A2 e-tron +28 kWh
    Audi A2 e-tron
    79
    Citroën ë-C4
    51
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi A2 e-tron −1 kWh/100 km
    Audi A2 e-tron
    13.9
    Citroën ë-C4
    14.9
  • Power PSAudi A2 e-tron +75 PS
    Audi A2 e-tron
    231
    Citroën ë-C4
    156
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi A2 e-tron −2.1 s
    Audi A2 e-tron
    7
    Citroën ë-C4
    9.1
  • Top speed km/hAudi A2 e-tron +10 km/h
    Audi A2 e-tron
    160
    Citroën ë-C4
    150
  • DC charging kWAudi A2 e-tron +83 kW
    Audi A2 e-tron
    183
    Citroën ë-C4
    100
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Audi A2 e-tron
    11
    Citroën ë-C4
    11
  • Weight ↓ kgCitroën ë-C4 −339 kg
    Audi A2 e-tron
    1910
    Citroën ë-C4
    1571
  • Boot lAudi A2 e-tron +16 l
    Audi A2 e-tron
    396
    Citroën ë-C4
    380

Add a third car

Technical data: Audi A2 e-tron vs Citroën ë-C4

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Audi A2 e-tron vs Citroën ë-C4
Key parameters Audi A2 e-tron
170 kW
Citroën ë-C4
Electric 156
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range646 km416 kmAudi +230 km
Battery79 kWh51 kWhAudi +28 kWh
Consumption ↓13.9 kWh/100 km14.9 kWh/100 kmAudi −1 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging183 kW100 kWAudi +83 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging ⚠29 min 10–80%35 min 20–80%6 min
Range per minute of charging15.6 km/min7.1 km/minAudi +8.5 km/min
Voltage—400 V—
Performance and drivetrain
Power231 PS156 PSAudi +75 PS
0–100 km/h ↓7 s9.1 sAudi −2.1 s
Top speed160 km/h150 km/hAudi +10 km/h
DrivetrainRWDFWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓1910 kg1571 kgCitroën −339 kg
Boot396 l380 lAudi +16 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length—4360 mm—
Width—1800 mm—
Height—1525 mm—
Wheelbase—2670 mm—

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Audi A2 e-tron

Cost per 100 km4.17
Monthly52
Yearly626

Citroën ë-C4

Cost per 100 km4.47
Monthly56
Yearly671

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Audi A2 e-tron

Citroën ë-C4

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Audi A2 e-tron or Citroën ë-C4?

The Audi A2 e-tron goes further: 646 km WLTP against the 416 km of the Citroën ë-C4. That is a difference of 230 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Audi A2 e-tron and the Citroën ë-C4 differ?

The Audi A2 e-tron has RWD and 231 PS. The Citroën ë-C4 has FWD and 156 PS.

Which is more powerful — Audi A2 e-tron or Citroën ë-C4?

The Audi A2 e-tron is stronger: 231 PS against the 156 PS of the Citroën ë-C4. The gap is 75 PS.

Which charges faster?

The Audi A2 e-tron accepts up to 183 kW DC, the Citroën ë-C4 up to 100 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.