Audi A2 e-tron vs Cupra Born

Cupra Born leads 4 to 2

Biggest differences: Power — Audi A2 e-tron 231 PS, Cupra Born 326 PS · 0–100 km/h — Audi A2 e-tron 7 s, Cupra Born 5.6 s · Top speed — Audi A2 e-tron 160 km/h, Cupra Born 200 km/h.

Audi A2 e-tron

The Audi A2 e-tron is an electric hatchback in the C segment, offered with four different powertrain configurations and a WLTP range of up to 646 km.

Cupra Born

Cupra Born is a C-segment hatchback, in model year 2026 in three variants: WLTP range from 484 to 630 km, power from 190 to 326 hp.

Profile against the market: Audi A2 e-tron vs Cupra Born

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Audi A2 e-tron or Cupra Born — who wins where

Cupra Born leads 4 to 2

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmAudi A2 e-tron +16 km
    Audi A2 e-tron
    646
    Cupra Born
    630
  • Battery kWhNo difference
    Audi A2 e-tron
    79
    Cupra Born
    79
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmCupra Born −1.4 kWh/100 km
    Audi A2 e-tron
    13.9
    Cupra Born
    12.5
  • Power PSCupra Born +95 PS
    Audi A2 e-tron
    231
    Cupra Born
    326
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sCupra Born −1.4 s
    Audi A2 e-tron
    7
    Cupra Born
    5.6
  • Top speed km/hCupra Born +40 km/h
    Audi A2 e-tron
    160
    Cupra Born
    200
  • DC charging kWNo difference
    Audi A2 e-tron
    183
    Cupra Born
    183
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Audi A2 e-tron
    11
    Cupra Born
    11
  • Charging ↓ minNo difference
    Audi A2 e-tron
    29
    Cupra Born
    29
  • Weight ↓ kgNo data
    Audi A2 e-tron
    1910
    Cupra Born
    —
  • Boot lAudi A2 e-tron +11 l
    Audi A2 e-tron
    396
    Cupra Born
    385

Add a third car

Technical data: Audi A2 e-tron vs Cupra Born

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Audi A2 e-tron vs Cupra Born
Key parameters Audi A2 e-tron
170 kW
Cupra Born
VZ 79 kWh · 2026 model year
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range646 km630 kmAudi +16 km
Battery79 kWh79 kWhNo difference
Consumption ↓13.9 kWh/100 km12.5 kWh/100 kmCupra −1.4 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging183 kW183 kWNo difference
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80% ↓29 min29 minNo difference
Range per minute of charging15.6 km/min15.2 km/minAudi +0.4 km/min
Voltage———
Performance and drivetrain
Power231 PS326 PSCupra +95 PS
0–100 km/h ↓7 s5.6 sCupra −1.4 s
Top speed160 km/h200 km/hCupra +40 km/h
DrivetrainRWDRWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓1910 kg——
Boot396 l385 lAudi +11 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly Audi
Length———
Width———
Height———
Wheelbase———

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Audi A2 e-tron

Cost per 100 km4.17
Monthly52
Yearly626

Cupra Born

Cost per 100 km3.75
Monthly47
Yearly563

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Audi A2 e-tron

Cupra Born

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Audi A2 e-tron or Cupra Born?

The Audi A2 e-tron goes further: 646 km WLTP against the 630 km of the Cupra Born. That is a difference of 16 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Audi A2 e-tron — its 79 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Cupra Born, with 79 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — Audi A2 e-tron or Cupra Born?

The Cupra Born is stronger: 326 PS against the 231 PS of the Audi A2 e-tron. The gap is 95 PS.

Which charges faster?

The Audi A2 e-tron accepts up to 183 kW DC, the Cupra Born up to 183 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 29 and 29 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.