Cupra Born vs MG 4

Biggest differences: Charging 10–80% — Cupra Born 26 min, MG 4 40 min · Power — Cupra Born 326 PS, MG 4 245 PS · DC charging — Cupra Born 185 kW, MG 4 144 kW.

Cupra Born

The Cupra Born is a C-segment hatchback with rear-wheel drive, offering variants with different battery capacities and power outputs.

MG 4

MG 4 is an electric C-segment hatchback offering three different drivetrain configurations, from the high-performance AWD model to variants with greater range.

Profile against the market: Cupra Born vs MG 4

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Cupra Born or MG 4 — who wins where

Cupra Born leads 7 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmCupra Born +25 km
    Cupra Born
    570
    MG 4
    545
  • Battery kWhCupra Born +4.6 kWh
    Cupra Born
    79
    MG 4
    74.4
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmMG 4 −0.4 kWh/100 km
    Cupra Born
    16.5
    MG 4
    16.1
  • Power PSCupra Born +81 PS
    Cupra Born
    326
    MG 4
    245
  • 0–100 km/h sCupra Born −0.6 s
    Cupra Born
    5.6
    MG 4
    6.2
  • Top speed km/hCupra Born +20 km/h
    Cupra Born
    200
    MG 4
    180
  • DC charging kWCupra Born +41 kW
    Cupra Born
    185
    MG 4
    144
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Cupra Born
    11
    MG 4
    11
  • Charging minCupra Born −14 min
    Cupra Born
    26
    MG 4
    40
  • Weight kgMG 4 −277 kg
    Cupra Born
    2032
    MG 4
    1755
  • Boot lMG 4 +3 l
    Cupra Born
    385
    MG 4
    388

Add a third car

Technical data: Cupra Born vs MG 4

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Cupra Born vs MG 4
Key parameters Cupra Born
VZ 79 kWh
MG 4
77 kWh Premium
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range570 km545 kmCupra +25 km
Battery79 kWh74.4 kWhCupra +4.6 kWh
Consumption16.5 kWh/100 km16.1 kWh/100 kmMG −0.4 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging185 kW144 kWCupra +41 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%26 min40 minCupra −14 min
Range per minute of charging15.3 km/min9.5 km/minCupra +5.8 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power326 PS245 PSCupra +81 PS
0–100 km/h5.6 s6.2 sCupra −0.6 s
Top speed200 km/h180 km/hCupra +20 km/h
DrivetrainRWDRWD
Practicality
Weight2032 kg1755 kgMG −277 kg
Boot385 l388 lMG +3 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly MG
Length4322 mm4287 mmCupra +35 mm
Width1809 mm1836 mmMG +27 mm
Height1530 mm1516 mmCupra +14 mm
Wheelbase2767 mm2705 mmCupra +62 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Cupra Born

Cost per 100 km4.95
Monthly62
Yearly743

MG 4

Cost per 100 km4.83
Monthly60
Yearly725

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Cupra Born

MG 4

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Cupra Born or MG 4?

The Cupra Born goes further: 570 km WLTP against the 545 km of the MG 4. That is a difference of 25 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the MG 4 — its 74.4 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Cupra Born, with 79 kWh, does not offer it.

Which charges faster?

The Cupra Born accepts up to 185 kW DC, the MG 4 up to 144 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 26 and 40 min respectively.

Which is cheaper to run?

The MG 4 uses less electricity: 16.1 kWh/100 km against 16.5 kWh/100 km in the Cupra Born. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 60 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.