Cupra Born vs MG 4

Cupra Born leads 8 to 1

Biggest differences: Charging 10–80% — Cupra Born 29 min, MG 4 40 min · Power — Cupra Born 326 PS, MG 4 245 PS · Consumption — Cupra Born 12.5 kWh/100 km, MG 4 16.1 kWh/100 km.

Cupra Born

Cupra Born is a C-segment hatchback, in model year 2026 in three variants: WLTP range from 484 to 630 km, power from 190 to 326 hp.

MG 4

MG 4 is an electric C-segment hatchback offering three different drivetrain configurations, from the high-performance AWD model to variants with greater range.

Profile against the market: Cupra Born vs MG 4

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Cupra Born or MG 4 — who wins where

Cupra Born leads 8 to 1

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmCupra Born +85 km
    Cupra Born
    630
    MG 4
    545
  • Battery kWhCupra Born +4.6 kWh
    Cupra Born
    79
    MG 4
    74.4
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmCupra Born −3.6 kWh/100 km
    Cupra Born
    12.5
    MG 4
    16.1
  • Power PSCupra Born +81 PS
    Cupra Born
    326
    MG 4
    245
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sCupra Born −0.6 s
    Cupra Born
    5.6
    MG 4
    6.2
  • Top speed km/hCupra Born +20 km/h
    Cupra Born
    200
    MG 4
    180
  • DC charging kWCupra Born +39 kW
    Cupra Born
    183
    MG 4
    144
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Cupra Born
    11
    MG 4
    11
  • Charging ↓ minCupra Born −11 min
    Cupra Born
    29
    MG 4
    40
  • Weight ↓ kgNo data
    Cupra Born
    —
    MG 4
    1755
  • Boot lMG 4 +3 l
    Cupra Born
    385
    MG 4
    388

Add a third car

Technical data: Cupra Born vs MG 4

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Cupra Born vs MG 4
Key parameters Cupra Born
VZ 79 kWh · 2026 model year
MG 4
77 kWh Premium
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range630 km545 kmCupra +85 km
Battery79 kWh74.4 kWhCupra +4.6 kWh
Consumption ↓12.5 kWh/100 km16.1 kWh/100 kmCupra −3.6 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging183 kW144 kWCupra +39 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80% ↓29 min40 minCupra −11 min
Range per minute of charging15.2 km/min9.5 km/minCupra +5.7 km/min
Voltage—400 V—
Performance and drivetrain
Power326 PS245 PSCupra +81 PS
0–100 km/h ↓5.6 s6.2 sCupra −0.6 s
Top speed200 km/h180 km/hCupra +20 km/h
DrivetrainRWDRWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓—1755 kg—
Boot385 l388 lMG +3 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly MG
Length—4287 mm—
Width—1836 mm—
Height—1516 mm—
Wheelbase—2705 mm—

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Cupra Born

Cost per 100 km3.75
Monthly47
Yearly563

MG 4

Cost per 100 km4.83
Monthly60
Yearly725

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Cupra Born

MG 4

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Cupra Born or MG 4?

The Cupra Born goes further: 630 km WLTP against the 545 km of the MG 4. That is a difference of 85 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the MG 4 — its 74.4 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Cupra Born, with 79 kWh, does not offer it.

Which charges faster?

The Cupra Born accepts up to 183 kW DC, the MG 4 up to 144 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 29 and 40 min respectively.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Cupra Born uses less electricity: 12.5 kWh/100 km against 16.1 kWh/100 km in the MG 4. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 540 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.