Audi A2 e-tron vs MG 4

Audi A2 e-tron leads 6 to 4

Biggest differences: Charging 10–80% — Audi A2 e-tron 29 min, MG 4 40 min · DC charging — Audi A2 e-tron 183 kW, MG 4 144 kW · WLTP range — Audi A2 e-tron 646 km, MG 4 545 km.

Audi A2 e-tron

The Audi A2 e-tron is an electric hatchback in the C segment, offered with four different powertrain configurations and a WLTP range of up to 646 km.

MG 4

MG 4 is an electric C-segment hatchback offering three different drivetrain configurations, from the high-performance AWD model to variants with greater range.

Profile against the market: Audi A2 e-tron vs MG 4

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Audi A2 e-tron or MG 4 — who wins where

Audi A2 e-tron leads 6 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmAudi A2 e-tron +101 km
    Audi A2 e-tron
    646
    MG 4
    545
  • Battery kWhAudi A2 e-tron +4.6 kWh
    Audi A2 e-tron
    79
    MG 4
    74.4
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi A2 e-tron −2.2 kWh/100 km
    Audi A2 e-tron
    13.9
    MG 4
    16.1
  • Power PSMG 4 +14 PS
    Audi A2 e-tron
    231
    MG 4
    245
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sMG 4 −0.8 s
    Audi A2 e-tron
    7
    MG 4
    6.2
  • Top speed km/hMG 4 +20 km/h
    Audi A2 e-tron
    160
    MG 4
    180
  • DC charging kWAudi A2 e-tron +39 kW
    Audi A2 e-tron
    183
    MG 4
    144
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Audi A2 e-tron
    11
    MG 4
    11
  • Charging ↓ minAudi A2 e-tron −11 min
    Audi A2 e-tron
    29
    MG 4
    40
  • Weight ↓ kgMG 4 −155 kg
    Audi A2 e-tron
    1910
    MG 4
    1755
  • Boot lAudi A2 e-tron +8 l
    Audi A2 e-tron
    396
    MG 4
    388

Add a third car

Technical data: Audi A2 e-tron vs MG 4

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Audi A2 e-tron vs MG 4
Key parameters Audi A2 e-tron
170 kW
MG 4
77 kWh Premium
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range646 km545 kmAudi +101 km
Battery79 kWh74.4 kWhAudi +4.6 kWh
Consumption ↓13.9 kWh/100 km16.1 kWh/100 kmAudi −2.2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging183 kW144 kWAudi +39 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80% ↓29 min40 minAudi −11 min
Range per minute of charging15.6 km/min9.5 km/minAudi +6.1 km/min
Voltage—400 V—
Performance and drivetrain
Power231 PS245 PSMG +14 PS
0–100 km/h ↓7 s6.2 sMG −0.8 s
Top speed160 km/h180 km/hMG +20 km/h
DrivetrainRWDRWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓1910 kg1755 kgMG −155 kg
Boot396 l388 lAudi +8 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length—4287 mm—
Width—1836 mm—
Height—1516 mm—
Wheelbase—2705 mm—

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Audi A2 e-tron

Cost per 100 km4.17
Monthly52
Yearly626

MG 4

Cost per 100 km4.83
Monthly60
Yearly725

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Audi A2 e-tron

MG 4

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Audi A2 e-tron or MG 4?

The Audi A2 e-tron goes further: 646 km WLTP against the 545 km of the MG 4. That is a difference of 101 km.

Which charges faster?

The Audi A2 e-tron accepts up to 183 kW DC, the MG 4 up to 144 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 29 and 40 min respectively.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Audi A2 e-tron uses less electricity: 13.9 kWh/100 km against 16.1 kWh/100 km in the MG 4. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 330 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.