Audi A2 e-tron vs Volkswagen ID.3

Audi A2 e-tron leads 5 to 0

Biggest differences: Weight — Audi A2 e-tron 1910 kg, Volkswagen ID.3 1966 kg · Consumption — Audi A2 e-tron 13.9 kWh/100 km, Volkswagen ID.3 14.3 kWh/100 km · Boot — Audi A2 e-tron 396 l, Volkswagen ID.3 385 l.

Audi A2 e-tron

The Audi A2 e-tron is an electric hatchback in the C segment, offered with four different powertrain configurations and a WLTP range of up to 646 km.

Volkswagen ID.3

Volkswagen ID.3 is a C-segment hatchback, in model year 2027 in three Neo variants: WLTP range from 417 to 630 km, power from 170 to 231 hp.

Profile against the market: Audi A2 e-tron vs Volkswagen ID.3

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Audi A2 e-tron or Volkswagen ID.3 — who wins where

Audi A2 e-tron leads 5 to 0

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmAudi A2 e-tron +16 km
    Audi A2 e-tron
    646
    Volkswagen ID.3
    630
  • Battery kWhNo difference
    Audi A2 e-tron
    79
    Volkswagen ID.3
    79
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi A2 e-tron −0.4 kWh/100 km
    Audi A2 e-tron
    13.9
    Volkswagen ID.3
    14.3
  • Power PSNo difference
    Audi A2 e-tron
    231
    Volkswagen ID.3
    231
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi A2 e-tron −0.1 s
    Audi A2 e-tron
    7
    Volkswagen ID.3
    7.1
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Audi A2 e-tron
    160
    Volkswagen ID.3
    160
  • DC charging kWNo difference
    Audi A2 e-tron
    183
    Volkswagen ID.3
    183
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Audi A2 e-tron
    11
    Volkswagen ID.3
    11
  • Charging ↓ minNo difference
    Audi A2 e-tron
    29
    Volkswagen ID.3
    29
  • Weight ↓ kgAudi A2 e-tron −56 kg
    Audi A2 e-tron
    1910
    Volkswagen ID.3
    1966
  • Boot lAudi A2 e-tron +11 l
    Audi A2 e-tron
    396
    Volkswagen ID.3
    385

Add a third car

Technical data: Audi A2 e-tron vs Volkswagen ID.3

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Audi A2 e-tron vs Volkswagen ID.3
Key parameters Audi A2 e-tron
170 kW
Volkswagen ID.3
Neo 79 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range646 km630 kmAudi +16 km
Battery79 kWh79 kWhNo difference
Consumption ↓13.9 kWh/100 km14.3 kWh/100 kmAudi −0.4 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging183 kW183 kWNo difference
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80% ↓29 min29 minNo difference
Range per minute of charging15.6 km/min15.2 km/minAudi +0.4 km/min
Voltage—400 V—
Performance and drivetrain
Power231 PS231 PSNo difference
0–100 km/h ↓7 s7.1 sAudi −0.1 s
Top speed160 km/h160 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainRWDRWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓1910 kg1966 kgAudi −56 kg
Boot396 l385 lAudi +11 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length—4265 mm—
Width—1809 mm—
Height—1554 mm—
Wheelbase—2766 mm—

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Audi A2 e-tron

Cost per 100 km4.17
Monthly52
Yearly626

Volkswagen ID.3

Cost per 100 km4.29
Monthly54
Yearly644

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Audi A2 e-tron

Volkswagen ID.3

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Audi A2 e-tron or Volkswagen ID.3?

The Audi A2 e-tron goes further: 646 km WLTP against the 630 km of the Volkswagen ID.3. That is a difference of 16 km.

Which charges faster?

The Audi A2 e-tron accepts up to 183 kW DC, the Volkswagen ID.3 up to 183 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 29 and 29 min respectively.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Audi A2 e-tron uses less electricity: 13.9 kWh/100 km against 14.3 kWh/100 km in the Volkswagen ID.3. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 60 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.