Audi A2 e-tron vs GAC Aion UT

Audi A2 e-tron leads 7 to 2

Biggest differences: DC charging — Audi A2 e-tron 183 kW, GAC Aion UT 87 kW · WLTP range — Audi A2 e-tron 646 km, GAC Aion UT 430 km · Battery — Audi A2 e-tron 79 kWh, GAC Aion UT 60 kWh.

Audi A2 e-tron

The Audi A2 e-tron is an electric hatchback in the C segment, offered with four different powertrain configurations and a WLTP range of up to 646 km.

GAC Aion UT

The GAC Aion UT is an electric hatchback in the C-segment, offering a range of 430 km according to the WLTP cycle and accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in 7.3 seconds.

Profile against the market: Audi A2 e-tron vs GAC Aion UT

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Audi A2 e-tron or GAC Aion UT — who wins where

Audi A2 e-tron leads 7 to 2

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmAudi A2 e-tron +216 km
    Audi A2 e-tron
    646
    GAC Aion UT
    430
  • Battery kWhAudi A2 e-tron +19 kWh
    Audi A2 e-tron
    79
    GAC Aion UT
    60
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi A2 e-tron −2.5 kWh/100 km
    Audi A2 e-tron
    13.9
    GAC Aion UT
    16.4
  • Power PSAudi A2 e-tron +27 PS
    Audi A2 e-tron
    231
    GAC Aion UT
    204
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi A2 e-tron −0.3 s
    Audi A2 e-tron
    7
    GAC Aion UT
    7.3
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Audi A2 e-tron
    160
    GAC Aion UT
    160
  • DC charging kWAudi A2 e-tron +96 kW
    Audi A2 e-tron
    183
    GAC Aion UT
    87
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Audi A2 e-tron
    11
    GAC Aion UT
    11
  • Charging ↓ minAudi A2 e-tron −3 min
    Audi A2 e-tron
    29
    GAC Aion UT
    32
  • Weight ↓ kgGAC Aion UT −265 kg
    Audi A2 e-tron
    1910
    GAC Aion UT
    1645
  • Boot lGAC Aion UT +44 l
    Audi A2 e-tron
    396
    GAC Aion UT
    440

Add a third car

Technical data: Audi A2 e-tron vs GAC Aion UT

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Audi A2 e-tron vs GAC Aion UT
Key parameters Audi A2 e-tron
170 kW
GAC Aion UT
60 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range646 km430 kmAudi +216 km
Battery79 kWh60 kWhAudi +19 kWh
Consumption ↓13.9 kWh/100 km16.4 kWh/100 kmAudi −2.5 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging183 kW87 kWAudi +96 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80% ↓29 min32 minAudi −3 min
Range per minute of charging15.6 km/min9.4 km/minAudi +6.2 km/min
Voltage—400 V—
Performance and drivetrain
Power231 PS204 PSAudi +27 PS
0–100 km/h ↓7 s7.3 sAudi −0.3 s
Top speed160 km/h160 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainRWDFWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓1910 kg1645 kgGAC −265 kg
Boot396 l440 lGAC +44 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length—4270 mm—
Width—1850 mm—
Height—1575 mm—
Wheelbase—2750 mm—

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Audi A2 e-tron

Cost per 100 km4.17
Monthly52
Yearly626

GAC Aion UT

Cost per 100 km4.92
Monthly61
Yearly738

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Audi A2 e-tron

GAC Aion UT

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Audi A2 e-tron or GAC Aion UT?

The Audi A2 e-tron goes further: 646 km WLTP against the 430 km of the GAC Aion UT. That is a difference of 216 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Audi A2 e-tron and the GAC Aion UT differ?

The Audi A2 e-tron has RWD and 231 PS. The GAC Aion UT has FWD and 204 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The GAC Aion UT takes more: 440 l against 396 l in the Audi A2 e-tron. The difference is 44 l.

Which charges faster?

The Audi A2 e-tron accepts up to 183 kW DC, the GAC Aion UT up to 87 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 29 and 32 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.