BYD Dolphin vs GAC Aion UT

Biggest differences: Boot — BYD Dolphin 345 l, GAC Aion UT 440 l · 0–100 km/h — BYD Dolphin 7 s, GAC Aion UT 7.3 s · Consumption — BYD Dolphin 15.9 kWh/100 km, GAC Aion UT 16.4 kWh/100 km.

BYD Dolphin

The BYD Dolphin is a compact hatchback in the C-segment, offering two versions with powerful front-wheel drive and a range exceeding 300 kilometers.

GAC Aion UT

The GAC Aion UT is an electric hatchback in the C-segment, offering a range of 430 km according to the WLTP cycle and accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in 7.3 seconds.

Profile against the market: BYD Dolphin vs GAC Aion UT

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BYD Dolphin or GAC Aion UT — who wins where

BYD Dolphin leads 4 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmGAC Aion UT +3 km
    BYD Dolphin
    427
    GAC Aion UT
    430
  • Battery kWhBYD Dolphin +0.5 kWh
    BYD Dolphin
    60.5
    GAC Aion UT
    60
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmBYD Dolphin −0.5 kWh/100 km
    BYD Dolphin
    15.9
    GAC Aion UT
    16.4
  • Power PSNo difference
    BYD Dolphin
    204
    GAC Aion UT
    204
  • 0–100 km/h sBYD Dolphin −0.3 s
    BYD Dolphin
    7
    GAC Aion UT
    7.3
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    BYD Dolphin
    160
    GAC Aion UT
    160
  • DC charging kWBYD Dolphin +1 kW
    BYD Dolphin
    88
    GAC Aion UT
    87
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BYD Dolphin
    11
    GAC Aion UT
    11
  • Weight kgGAC Aion UT −13 kg
    BYD Dolphin
    1658
    GAC Aion UT
    1645
  • Boot lGAC Aion UT +95 l
    BYD Dolphin
    345
    GAC Aion UT
    440

Add a third car

Technical data: BYD Dolphin vs GAC Aion UT

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BYD Dolphin vs GAC Aion UT
Key parameters BYD Dolphin
Design
GAC Aion UT
60 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range427 km430 kmGAC +3 km
Battery60.5 kWh60 kWhBYD +0.5 kWh
Consumption15.9 kWh/100 km16.4 kWh/100 kmBYD −0.5 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging88 kW87 kWBYD +1 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 29 min 30–80%32 min 10–80%3 min
Range per minute of charging7.4 km/min9.4 km/minGAC +2 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS204 PSNo difference
0–100 km/h7 s7.3 sBYD −0.3 s
Top speed160 km/h160 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1658 kg1645 kgGAC −13 kg
Boot345 l440 lGAC +95 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4290 mm4270 mmBYD +20 mm
Width1770 mm1850 mmGAC +80 mm
Height1570 mm1575 mmGAC +5 mm
Wheelbase2700 mm2750 mmGAC +50 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BYD Dolphin

Cost per 100 km4.77
Monthly60
Yearly716

GAC Aion UT

Cost per 100 km4.92
Monthly61
Yearly738

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BYD Dolphin

GAC Aion UT

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Why does the BYD Dolphin have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the GAC Aion UT?

The BYD Dolphin carries 60.5 kWh and covers 427 km, while the GAC Aion UT with its 60 kWh battery does 430 km. Energy use decides it: 15.9 against 16.4 kWh/100 km.

Which has the bigger boot?

The GAC Aion UT takes more: 440 l against 345 l in the BYD Dolphin. The difference is 95 l.

Which charges faster?

The BYD Dolphin accepts up to 88 kW DC, the GAC Aion UT up to 87 kW.

Which is cheaper to run?

The BYD Dolphin uses less electricity: 15.9 kWh/100 km against 16.4 kWh/100 km in the GAC Aion UT. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 75 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.