BYD Dolphin vs Citroën ë-C4

Biggest differences: Power — BYD Dolphin 204 PS, Citroën ë-C4 156 PS · 0–100 km/h — BYD Dolphin 7 s, Citroën ë-C4 9.1 s · Battery — BYD Dolphin 60.5 kWh, Citroën ë-C4 51 kWh.

BYD Dolphin

The BYD Dolphin is a compact hatchback in the C-segment, offering two versions with powerful front-wheel drive and a range exceeding 300 kilometers.

Citroën ë-C4

The Citroën ë-C4 is a compact electric hatchback that offers two different power and range options.

Profile against the market: BYD Dolphin vs Citroën ë-C4

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BYD Dolphin or Citroën ë-C4 — who wins where

BYD Dolphin leads 5 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBYD Dolphin +11 km
    BYD Dolphin
    427
    Citroën ë-C4
    416
  • Battery kWhBYD Dolphin +9.5 kWh
    BYD Dolphin
    60.5
    Citroën ë-C4
    51
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmCitroën ë-C4 −1 kWh/100 km
    BYD Dolphin
    15.9
    Citroën ë-C4
    14.9
  • Power PSBYD Dolphin +48 PS
    BYD Dolphin
    204
    Citroën ë-C4
    156
  • 0–100 km/h sBYD Dolphin −2.1 s
    BYD Dolphin
    7
    Citroën ë-C4
    9.1
  • Top speed km/hBYD Dolphin +10 km/h
    BYD Dolphin
    160
    Citroën ë-C4
    150
  • DC charging kWCitroën ë-C4 +12 kW
    BYD Dolphin
    88
    Citroën ë-C4
    100
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BYD Dolphin
    11
    Citroën ë-C4
    11
  • Weight kgCitroën ë-C4 −87 kg
    BYD Dolphin
    1658
    Citroën ë-C4
    1571
  • Boot lCitroën ë-C4 +35 l
    BYD Dolphin
    345
    Citroën ë-C4
    380

Add a third car

Technical data: BYD Dolphin vs Citroën ë-C4

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BYD Dolphin vs Citroën ë-C4
Key parameters BYD Dolphin
Design
Citroën ë-C4
Electric 156
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range427 km416 kmBYD +11 km
Battery60.5 kWh51 kWhBYD +9.5 kWh
Consumption15.9 kWh/100 km14.9 kWh/100 kmCitroën −1 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging88 kW100 kWCitroën +12 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 29 min 30–80%35 min 20–80%6 min
Range per minute of charging7.4 km/min7.1 km/minBYD +0.3 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS156 PSBYD +48 PS
0–100 km/h7 s9.1 sBYD −2.1 s
Top speed160 km/h150 km/hBYD +10 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1658 kg1571 kgCitroën −87 kg
Boot345 l380 lCitroën +35 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4290 mm4360 mmCitroën +70 mm
Width1770 mm1800 mmCitroën +30 mm
Height1570 mm1525 mmBYD +45 mm
Wheelbase2700 mm2670 mmBYD +30 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BYD Dolphin

Cost per 100 km4.77
Monthly60
Yearly716

Citroën ë-C4

Cost per 100 km4.47
Monthly56
Yearly671

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BYD Dolphin

Citroën ë-C4

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BYD Dolphin or Citroën ë-C4?

The BYD Dolphin goes further: 427 km WLTP against the 416 km of the Citroën ë-C4. That is a difference of 11 km.

Which charges faster?

The BYD Dolphin accepts up to 88 kW DC, the Citroën ë-C4 up to 100 kW.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Citroën ë-C4 uses less electricity: 14.9 kWh/100 km against 15.9 kWh/100 km in the BYD Dolphin. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 150 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.