GAC Aion UT vs Leapmotor B05

Biggest differences: DC charging — GAC Aion UT 87 kW, Leapmotor B05 174 kW · Boot — GAC Aion UT 440 l, Leapmotor B05 345 l · WLTP range — GAC Aion UT 430 km, Leapmotor B05 482 km.

GAC Aion UT

The GAC Aion UT is an electric hatchback in the C-segment, offering a range of 430 km according to the WLTP cycle and accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in 7.3 seconds.

Leapmotor B05

The Leapmotor B05 is a compact rear-wheel-drive hatchback that offers a range of up to 482 kilometers with the 67 kWh battery option.

Profile against the market: GAC Aion UT vs Leapmotor B05

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

GAC Aion UT or Leapmotor B05 — who wins where

Leapmotor B05 leads 7 to 2

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmLeapmotor B05 +52 km
    GAC Aion UT
    430
    Leapmotor B05
    482
  • Battery kWhLeapmotor B05 +7.1 kWh
    GAC Aion UT
    60
    Leapmotor B05
    67.1
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmLeapmotor B05 −0.5 kWh/100 km
    GAC Aion UT
    16.4
    Leapmotor B05
    15.9
  • Power PSLeapmotor B05 +14 PS
    GAC Aion UT
    204
    Leapmotor B05
    218
  • 0–100 km/h sLeapmotor B05 −0.6 s
    GAC Aion UT
    7.3
    Leapmotor B05
    6.7
  • Top speed km/hLeapmotor B05 +10 km/h
    GAC Aion UT
    160
    Leapmotor B05
    170
  • DC charging kWLeapmotor B05 +87 kW
    GAC Aion UT
    87
    Leapmotor B05
    174
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    GAC Aion UT
    11
    Leapmotor B05
    11
  • Weight kgGAC Aion UT −192 kg
    GAC Aion UT
    1645
    Leapmotor B05
    1837
  • Boot lGAC Aion UT +95 l
    GAC Aion UT
    440
    Leapmotor B05
    345

Add a third car

Technical data: GAC Aion UT vs Leapmotor B05

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: GAC Aion UT vs Leapmotor B05
Key parameters GAC Aion UT
60 kWh
Leapmotor B05
Design 67 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range430 km482 kmLeapmotor +52 km
Battery60 kWh67.1 kWhLeapmotor +7.1 kWh
Consumption16.4 kWh/100 km15.9 kWh/100 kmLeapmotor −0.5 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging87 kW174 kWLeapmotor +87 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 32 min 10–80%17 min 30–80%15 min
Range per minute of charging9.4 km/min14.2 km/minLeapmotor +4.8 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS218 PSLeapmotor +14 PS
0–100 km/h7.3 s6.7 sLeapmotor −0.6 s
Top speed160 km/h170 km/hLeapmotor +10 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1645 kg1837 kgGAC −192 kg
Boot440 l345 lGAC +95 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4270 mm4430 mmLeapmotor +160 mm
Width1850 mm1880 mmLeapmotor +30 mm
Height1575 mm1520 mmGAC +55 mm
Wheelbase2750 mm2735 mmGAC +15 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

GAC Aion UT

Cost per 100 km4.92
Monthly61
Yearly738

Leapmotor B05

Cost per 100 km4.77
Monthly60
Yearly716

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

GAC Aion UT

Leapmotor B05

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — GAC Aion UT or Leapmotor B05?

The Leapmotor B05 goes further: 482 km WLTP against the 430 km of the GAC Aion UT. That is a difference of 52 km.

How do the drivetrains of the GAC Aion UT and the Leapmotor B05 differ?

The GAC Aion UT has FWD and 204 PS. The Leapmotor B05 has RWD and 218 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The GAC Aion UT takes more: 440 l against 345 l in the Leapmotor B05. The difference is 95 l.

Which charges faster?

The GAC Aion UT accepts up to 87 kW DC, the Leapmotor B05 up to 174 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.