DS N°4 vs Peugeot e-308

Biggest differences: Power — DS N°4 213 PS, Peugeot e-308 156 PS · 0–100 km/h — DS N°4 7.1 s, Peugeot e-308 9.3 s · DC charging — DS N°4 120 kW, Peugeot e-308 100 kW.

DS N°4

The DS N°4 is an electric hatchback in the C-segment, offering a WLTP range of 447 km and accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in 7.1 seconds.

Peugeot e-308

The Peugeot e-308 is an electric hatchback in the C-segment, offering a range of up to 450 km in the WLTP cycle and front-wheel drive (FWD).

Profile against the market: DS N°4 vs Peugeot e-308

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

DS N°4 or Peugeot e-308 — who wins where

DS N°4 leads 6 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmPeugeot e-308 +3 km
    DS N°4
    447
    Peugeot e-308
    450
  • Battery kWhDS N°4 +2.9 kWh
    DS N°4
    58.3
    Peugeot e-308
    55.4
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmPeugeot e-308 −0.2 kWh/100 km
    DS N°4
    15.1
    Peugeot e-308
    14.9
  • Power PSDS N°4 +57 PS
    DS N°4
    213
    Peugeot e-308
    156
  • 0–100 km/h sDS N°4 −2.2 s
    DS N°4
    7.1
    Peugeot e-308
    9.3
  • Top speed km/hPeugeot e-308 +10 km/h
    DS N°4
    160
    Peugeot e-308
    170
  • DC charging kWDS N°4 +20 kW
    DS N°4
    120
    Peugeot e-308
    100
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    DS N°4
    11
    Peugeot e-308
    11
  • Charging minDS N°4 −1 min
    DS N°4
    31
    Peugeot e-308
    32
  • Weight kgPeugeot e-308 −118 kg
    DS N°4
    1792
    Peugeot e-308
    1674
  • Boot lDS N°4 +29 l
    DS N°4
    390
    Peugeot e-308
    361

Add a third car

Technical data: DS N°4 vs Peugeot e-308

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: DS N°4 vs Peugeot e-308
Key parameters DS N°4
E-Tense 213 KM
Peugeot e-308
156
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range447 km450 kmPeugeot +3 km
Battery58.3 kWh55.4 kWhDS +2.9 kWh
Consumption15.1 kWh/100 km14.9 kWh/100 kmPeugeot −0.2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging120 kW100 kWDS +20 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 20–80%31 min32 minDS −1 min
Range per minute of charging8.7 km/min8.4 km/minDS +0.3 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power213 PS156 PSDS +57 PS
0–100 km/h7.1 s9.3 sDS −2.2 s
Top speed160 km/h170 km/hPeugeot +10 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1792 kg1674 kgPeugeot −118 kg
Boot390 l361 lDS +29 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4400 mm4367 mmDS +33 mm
Width1870 mm1852 mmDS +18 mm
Height1490 mm1441 mmDS +49 mm
Wheelbase2675 mm2675 mmNo difference

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

DS N°4

Cost per 100 km4.53
Monthly57
Yearly679

Peugeot e-308

Cost per 100 km4.47
Monthly56
Yearly671

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

DS N°4

Peugeot e-308

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Why does the DS N°4 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Peugeot e-308?

The DS N°4 carries 58.3 kWh and covers 447 km, while the Peugeot e-308 with its 55.4 kWh battery does 450 km. Energy use decides it: 15.1 against 14.9 kWh/100 km.

Which is more powerful — DS N°4 or Peugeot e-308?

The DS N°4 is stronger: 213 PS against the 156 PS of the Peugeot e-308. The gap is 57 PS.

Which charges faster?

The DS N°4 accepts up to 120 kW DC, the Peugeot e-308 up to 100 kW. Charging from 20 to 80% takes 31 and 32 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.