Audi A2 e-tron vs DS N°4

Audi A2 e-tron leads 7 to 1

Biggest differences: DC charging — Audi A2 e-tron 183 kW, DS N°4 120 kW · WLTP range — Audi A2 e-tron 646 km, DS N°4 447 km · Battery — Audi A2 e-tron 79 kWh, DS N°4 58.3 kWh.

Audi A2 e-tron

The Audi A2 e-tron is an electric hatchback in the C segment, offered with four different powertrain configurations and a WLTP range of up to 646 km.

DS N°4

The DS N°4 is an electric hatchback in the C-segment, offering a WLTP range of 447 km and accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in 7.1 seconds.

Profile against the market: Audi A2 e-tron vs DS N°4

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Audi A2 e-tron or DS N°4 — who wins where

Audi A2 e-tron leads 7 to 1

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmAudi A2 e-tron +199 km
    Audi A2 e-tron
    646
    DS N°4
    447
  • Battery kWhAudi A2 e-tron +20.7 kWh
    Audi A2 e-tron
    79
    DS N°4
    58.3
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi A2 e-tron −1.2 kWh/100 km
    Audi A2 e-tron
    13.9
    DS N°4
    15.1
  • Power PSAudi A2 e-tron +18 PS
    Audi A2 e-tron
    231
    DS N°4
    213
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi A2 e-tron −0.1 s
    Audi A2 e-tron
    7
    DS N°4
    7.1
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Audi A2 e-tron
    160
    DS N°4
    160
  • DC charging kWAudi A2 e-tron +63 kW
    Audi A2 e-tron
    183
    DS N°4
    120
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Audi A2 e-tron
    11
    DS N°4
    11
  • Weight ↓ kgDS N°4 −118 kg
    Audi A2 e-tron
    1910
    DS N°4
    1792
  • Boot lAudi A2 e-tron +6 l
    Audi A2 e-tron
    396
    DS N°4
    390

Add a third car

Technical data: Audi A2 e-tron vs DS N°4

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Audi A2 e-tron vs DS N°4
Key parameters Audi A2 e-tron
170 kW
DS N°4
E-Tense 213 KM
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range646 km447 kmAudi +199 km
Battery79 kWh58.3 kWhAudi +20.7 kWh
Consumption ↓13.9 kWh/100 km15.1 kWh/100 kmAudi −1.2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging183 kW120 kWAudi +63 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging ⚠29 min 10–80%31 min 20–80%2 min
Range per minute of charging15.6 km/min8.7 km/minAudi +6.9 km/min
Voltage—400 V—
Performance and drivetrain
Power231 PS213 PSAudi +18 PS
0–100 km/h ↓7 s7.1 sAudi −0.1 s
Top speed160 km/h160 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainRWDFWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓1910 kg1792 kgDS −118 kg
Boot396 l390 lAudi +6 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length—4400 mm—
Width—1870 mm—
Height—1490 mm—
Wheelbase—2675 mm—

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Audi A2 e-tron

Cost per 100 km4.17
Monthly52
Yearly626

DS N°4

Cost per 100 km4.53
Monthly57
Yearly679

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Audi A2 e-tron

DS N°4

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Audi A2 e-tron or DS N°4?

The Audi A2 e-tron goes further: 646 km WLTP against the 447 km of the DS N°4. That is a difference of 199 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Audi A2 e-tron and the DS N°4 differ?

The Audi A2 e-tron has RWD and 231 PS. The DS N°4 has FWD and 213 PS.

Which charges faster?

The Audi A2 e-tron accepts up to 183 kW DC, the DS N°4 up to 120 kW.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Audi A2 e-tron uses less electricity: 13.9 kWh/100 km against 15.1 kWh/100 km in the DS N°4. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 180 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.