Audi A2 e-tron vs Peugeot e-308

Audi A2 e-tron leads 7 to 2

Biggest differences: DC charging — Audi A2 e-tron 183 kW, Peugeot e-308 100 kW · Power — Audi A2 e-tron 231 PS, Peugeot e-308 156 PS · WLTP range — Audi A2 e-tron 646 km, Peugeot e-308 450 km.

Audi A2 e-tron

The Audi A2 e-tron is an electric hatchback in the C segment, offered with four different powertrain configurations and a WLTP range of up to 646 km.

Peugeot e-308

The Peugeot e-308 is an electric hatchback in the C-segment, offering a range of up to 450 km in the WLTP cycle and front-wheel drive (FWD).

Profile against the market: Audi A2 e-tron vs Peugeot e-308

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Audi A2 e-tron or Peugeot e-308 — who wins where

Audi A2 e-tron leads 7 to 2

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmAudi A2 e-tron +196 km
    Audi A2 e-tron
    646
    Peugeot e-308
    450
  • Battery kWhAudi A2 e-tron +23.6 kWh
    Audi A2 e-tron
    79
    Peugeot e-308
    55.4
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi A2 e-tron −1 kWh/100 km
    Audi A2 e-tron
    13.9
    Peugeot e-308
    14.9
  • Power PSAudi A2 e-tron +75 PS
    Audi A2 e-tron
    231
    Peugeot e-308
    156
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi A2 e-tron −2.3 s
    Audi A2 e-tron
    7
    Peugeot e-308
    9.3
  • Top speed km/hPeugeot e-308 +10 km/h
    Audi A2 e-tron
    160
    Peugeot e-308
    170
  • DC charging kWAudi A2 e-tron +83 kW
    Audi A2 e-tron
    183
    Peugeot e-308
    100
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Audi A2 e-tron
    11
    Peugeot e-308
    11
  • Weight ↓ kgPeugeot e-308 −236 kg
    Audi A2 e-tron
    1910
    Peugeot e-308
    1674
  • Boot lAudi A2 e-tron +35 l
    Audi A2 e-tron
    396
    Peugeot e-308
    361

Add a third car

Technical data: Audi A2 e-tron vs Peugeot e-308

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Audi A2 e-tron vs Peugeot e-308
Key parameters Audi A2 e-tron
170 kW
Peugeot e-308
156
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range646 km450 kmAudi +196 km
Battery79 kWh55.4 kWhAudi +23.6 kWh
Consumption ↓13.9 kWh/100 km14.9 kWh/100 kmAudi −1 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging183 kW100 kWAudi +83 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging ⚠29 min 10–80%32 min 20–80%3 min
Range per minute of charging15.6 km/min8.4 km/minAudi +7.2 km/min
Voltage—400 V—
Performance and drivetrain
Power231 PS156 PSAudi +75 PS
0–100 km/h ↓7 s9.3 sAudi −2.3 s
Top speed160 km/h170 km/hPeugeot +10 km/h
DrivetrainRWDFWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓1910 kg1674 kgPeugeot −236 kg
Boot396 l361 lAudi +35 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length—4367 mm—
Width—1852 mm—
Height—1441 mm—
Wheelbase—2675 mm—

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Audi A2 e-tron

Cost per 100 km4.17
Monthly52
Yearly626

Peugeot e-308

Cost per 100 km4.47
Monthly56
Yearly671

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Audi A2 e-tron

Peugeot e-308

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Audi A2 e-tron or Peugeot e-308?

The Audi A2 e-tron goes further: 646 km WLTP against the 450 km of the Peugeot e-308. That is a difference of 196 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Audi A2 e-tron and the Peugeot e-308 differ?

The Audi A2 e-tron has RWD and 231 PS. The Peugeot e-308 has FWD and 156 PS.

Which is more powerful — Audi A2 e-tron or Peugeot e-308?

The Audi A2 e-tron is stronger: 231 PS against the 156 PS of the Peugeot e-308. The gap is 75 PS.

Which charges faster?

The Audi A2 e-tron accepts up to 183 kW DC, the Peugeot e-308 up to 100 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.