GAC Aion UT vs MG 4
Biggest differences: DC charging — GAC Aion UT 87 kW, MG 4 144 kW · WLTP range — GAC Aion UT 430 km, MG 4 545 km · Charging 10–80% — GAC Aion UT 32 min, MG 4 40 min.
GAC Aion UT
The GAC Aion UT is an electric hatchback in the C-segment, offering a range of 430 km according to the WLTP cycle and accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in 7.3 seconds.
MG 4
MG 4 is an electric C-segment hatchback offering three different drivetrain configurations, from the high-performance AWD model to variants with greater range.
Profile against the market: GAC Aion UT vs MG 4
GAC Aion UT60 kWh
MG 477 kWh Premium
GAC Aion UT or MG 4 — who wins where
MG 4 leads 7 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMG 4 +115 km
- Battery kWhMG 4 +14.4 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMG 4 −0.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSMG 4 +41 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sMG 4 −1.1 s
- Top speed km/hMG 4 +20 km/h
- DC charging kWMG 4 +57 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minGAC Aion UT −8 min
- Weight ↓ kgGAC Aion UT −110 kg
- Boot lGAC Aion UT +52 l
Technical data: GAC Aion UT vs MG 4
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | GAC Aion UT 60 kWh | MG 4 77 kWh Premium | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 430 km | 545 km | MG +115 km |
| Battery | 60 kWh | 74.4 kWh | MG +14.4 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 16.4 kWh/100 km | 16.1 kWh/100 km | MG −0.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 87 kW | 144 kW | MG +57 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 32 min | 40 min | GAC −8 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 9.4 km/min | 9.5 km/min | MG +0.1 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 204 PS | 245 PS | MG +41 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.3 s | 6.2 s | MG −1.1 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 180 km/h | MG +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1645 kg | 1755 kg | GAC −110 kg |
| Boot | 440 l | 388 l | GAC +52 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4270 mm | 4287 mm | MG +17 mm |
| Width | 1850 mm | 1836 mm | GAC +14 mm |
| Height | 1575 mm | 1516 mm | GAC +59 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2750 mm | 2705 mm | GAC +45 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
GAC Aion UT
MG 4
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — GAC Aion UT or MG 4?
The MG 4 goes further: 545 km WLTP against the 430 km of the GAC Aion UT. That is a difference of 115 km.
How do the drivetrains of the GAC Aion UT and the MG 4 differ?
The GAC Aion UT has FWD and 204 PS. The MG 4 has RWD and 245 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The GAC Aion UT takes more: 440 l against 388 l in the MG 4. The difference is 52 l.
Which charges faster?
The GAC Aion UT accepts up to 87 kW DC, the MG 4 up to 144 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 32 and 40 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.