Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Nissan Ariya
Ford Mustang Mach-E leads 7 to 1
Biggest differences: Consumption — Ford Mustang Mach-E 14.3 kWh/100 km, Nissan Ariya 18.1 kWh/100 km · 0–100 km/h — Ford Mustang Mach-E 6.1 s, Nissan Ariya 7.6 s · Power — Ford Mustang Mach-E 276 PS, Nissan Ariya 238 PS.
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Ford Mustang Mach-E is a D-segment SUV, in model year 2026 in four variants: WLTP range from 470 to 615 km, power from 268 to 487 hp.
Nissan Ariya
Nissan Ariya is a D-segment crossover in five variants: WLTP range from 403 to 533 km, power from 214 to 435 hp.
Profile against the market: Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Nissan Ariya
Ford Mustang Mach-EExtended Range RWD · 2026 model year
Nissan Ariya87 kWh
Ford Mustang Mach-E or Nissan Ariya — who wins where
Ford Mustang Mach-E leads 7 to 1
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmFord Mustang Mach-E +82 km
- Battery kWhFord Mustang Mach-E +1 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmFord Mustang Mach-E −3.8 kWh/100 km
- Power PSFord Mustang Mach-E +38 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sFord Mustang Mach-E −1.5 s
- Top speed km/hFord Mustang Mach-E +20 km/h
- DC charging kWFord Mustang Mach-E +20 kW
- AC charging kWNo data
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgNissan Ariya −27 kg
- Boot lNo data
Technical data: Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Nissan Ariya
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range RWD · 2026 model year | Nissan Ariya 87 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 615 km | 533 km | Ford +82 km |
| Battery | 88 kWh | 87 kWh | Ford +1 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.3 kWh/100 km | 18.1 kWh/100 km | Ford −3.8 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 150 kW | 130 kW | Ford +20 kW |
| AC charging | — | 22 kW | — |
| Charging 20–80% ↓ | — | 30 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 10.7 km/min | — |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 276 PS | 238 PS | Ford +38 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.1 s | 7.6 s | Ford −1.5 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 160 km/h | Ford +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2086 kg | 2059 kg | Nissan −27 kg |
| Boot | — | 466 l | — |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Nissan |
| Length | — | 4595 mm | — |
| Width | — | 1850 mm | — |
| Height | — | 1650 mm | — |
| Wheelbase | — | 2775 mm | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Nissan Ariya
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Ford Mustang Mach-E
Nissan Ariya
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Ford Mustang Mach-E or Nissan Ariya?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E goes further: 615 km WLTP against the 533 km of the Nissan Ariya. That is a difference of 82 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Ford Mustang Mach-E and the Nissan Ariya differ?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E has RWD and 276 PS. The Nissan Ariya has FWD and 238 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Nissan Ariya — its 87 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Ford Mustang Mach-E, with 88 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Ford Mustang Mach-E accepts up to 150 kW DC, the Nissan Ariya up to 130 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.