Elaris BEO vs Mazda CX-6e
Elaris BEO leads 4 to 2
Biggest differences: Boot — Elaris BEO 467 l, Mazda CX-6e 363 l · Power — Elaris BEO 204 PS, Mazda CX-6e 258 PS · Top speed — Elaris BEO 150 km/h, Mazda CX-6e 185 km/h.
Elaris BEO
Elaris BEO is a D-segment SUV, in model year 2026 in two variants with 204 hp: WLTP range from 456 to 489 km.
Mazda CX-6e
The Mazda CX-6e is a D-segment SUV with rear-wheel drive, offering a range of 484 km in the WLTP cycle and fast DC charging capabilities.
Profile against the market: Elaris BEO vs Mazda CX-6e
- Elaris BEOInnovationspaket
Mazda CX-6eTakumi
Elaris BEO or Mazda CX-6e — who wins where
Elaris BEO leads 4 to 2
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmElaris BEO +5 km
- Battery kWhElaris BEO +8 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmElaris BEO −1.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSMazda CX-6e +54 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo data
- Top speed km/hMazda CX-6e +35 km/h
- DC charging kWNo data
- AC charging kWNo data
- Weight ↓ kgNo data
- Boot lElaris BEO +104 l
Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Mazda CX-6e
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Elaris BEO Innovationspaket | Mazda CX-6e Takumi | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 489 km | 484 km | Elaris +5 km |
| Battery | 86 kWh | 78 kWh | Elaris +8 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.6 kWh/100 km | 18.9 kWh/100 km | Elaris −1.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | — | 195 kW | — |
| AC charging | — | 11 kW | — |
| Charging ⚠ | 45 min 20–80% | 24 min 10–80% | 21 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 6.5 km/min | 14.1 km/min | Mazda +7.6 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 204 PS | 258 PS | Mazda +54 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | — | 7.9 s | — |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 185 km/h | Mazda +35 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | — | 2130 kg | — |
| Boot | 467 l | 363 l | Elaris +104 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Mazda |
| Length | — | 4850 mm | — |
| Width | — | 1935 mm | — |
| Height | — | 1620 mm | — |
| Wheelbase | — | 2902 mm | — |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Elaris BEO
Mazda CX-6e
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Elaris BEO
Mazda CX-6e
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
How do the drivetrains of the Elaris BEO and the Mazda CX-6e differ?
The Elaris BEO has FWD and 204 PS. The Mazda CX-6e has RWD and 258 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Mazda CX-6e — its 78 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Elaris BEO, with 86 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Elaris BEO takes more: 467 l against 363 l in the Mazda CX-6e. The difference is 104 l.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Elaris BEO uses less electricity: 17.6 kWh/100 km against 18.9 kWh/100 km in the Mazda CX-6e. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 195 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.