Cupra Raval vs Peugeot e-208

Biggest differences: Boot — Cupra Raval 441 l, Peugeot e-208 265 l · Power — Cupra Raval 211 PS, Peugeot e-208 156 PS · 0–100 km/h — Cupra Raval 7.1 s, Peugeot e-208 8.2 s.

Cupra Raval

The Cupra Raval is an all-electric hatchback in the B segment, offered in three different powertrain configurations, each with varying power output and range.

Peugeot e-208

The Peugeot e-208 is a city hatchback in the B-segment, offered with three different powertrain options, each offering varying power outputs and battery capacities.

Profile against the market: Cupra Raval vs Peugeot e-208

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Cupra Raval or Peugeot e-208 — who wins where

Cupra Raval leads 8 to 1

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmCupra Raval +11 km
    Cupra Raval
    444
    Peugeot e-208
    433
  • Battery kWhCupra Raval +1 kWh
    Cupra Raval
    52
    Peugeot e-208
    51
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmCupra Raval −1.3 kWh/100 km
    Cupra Raval
    13.6
    Peugeot e-208
    14.9
  • Power PSCupra Raval +55 PS
    Cupra Raval
    211
    Peugeot e-208
    156
  • 0–100 km/h sCupra Raval −1.1 s
    Cupra Raval
    7.1
    Peugeot e-208
    8.2
  • Top speed km/hCupra Raval +10 km/h
    Cupra Raval
    160
    Peugeot e-208
    150
  • DC charging kWCupra Raval +5 kW
    Cupra Raval
    105
    Peugeot e-208
    100
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Cupra Raval
    11
    Peugeot e-208
    11
  • Weight kgPeugeot e-208 −155 kg
    Cupra Raval
    1610
    Peugeot e-208
    1455
  • Boot lCupra Raval +176 l
    Cupra Raval
    441
    Peugeot e-208
    265

Add a third car

Technical data: Cupra Raval vs Peugeot e-208

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Cupra Raval vs Peugeot e-208
Key parameters Cupra Raval
52 kWh
Peugeot e-208
GT 156
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range444 km433 kmCupra +11 km
Battery52 kWh51 kWhCupra +1 kWh
Consumption13.6 kWh/100 km14.9 kWh/100 kmCupra −1.3 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging105 kW100 kWCupra +5 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 28 min 10–80%35 min 0–80%7 min
Range per minute of charging11.1 km/min9.9 km/minCupra +1.2 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power211 PS156 PSCupra +55 PS
0–100 km/h7.1 s8.2 sCupra −1.1 s
Top speed160 km/h150 km/hCupra +10 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1610 kg1455 kgPeugeot −155 kg
Boot441 l265 lCupra +176 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4046 mm4055 mmPeugeot +9 mm
Width1784 mm1745 mmCupra +39 mm
Height1514 mm1430 mmCupra +84 mm
Wheelbase2599 mm2540 mmCupra +59 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Cupra Raval

Cost per 100 km4.08
Monthly51
Yearly612

Peugeot e-208

Cost per 100 km4.47
Monthly56
Yearly671

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Cupra Raval

Peugeot e-208

Other comparisons in this class: Hatchback, segment B

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Cupra Raval or Peugeot e-208?

The Cupra Raval goes further: 444 km WLTP against the 433 km of the Peugeot e-208. That is a difference of 11 km.

Which is more powerful — Cupra Raval or Peugeot e-208?

The Cupra Raval is stronger: 211 PS against the 156 PS of the Peugeot e-208. The gap is 55 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Cupra Raval takes more: 441 l against 265 l in the Peugeot e-208. The difference is 176 l.

Which charges faster?

The Cupra Raval accepts up to 105 kW DC, the Peugeot e-208 up to 100 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.